ArticleNeuroImage2017
Functional modular architecture underlying attentional control in aging.
Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-related differences in resting-state, task-related, and structural brain connectivity: graph theoretical analyses and visual search performance.Brain structure & function · 2024Article
- Age-related fornix decline predicts conservative response strategy-based slowing in perceptual decision-making.Aging brain · 2024Article
- Review
- Age-related differences in frontoparietal activation for target and distractor singletons during visual search.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2023Article
- Cortical iron mediates age-related decline in fluid cognition.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Age-Related Compensatory Reconfiguration of PFC Connections during Episodic Memory Retrieval.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Predicting Age From Behavioral Test Performance for Screening Early Onset of Cognitive Decline.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Article
- Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Overactivation of the Habitual Control Brain System in Tobacco Dependence.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2021Article
- Influence of structural and functional brain connectivity on age-related differences in fluid cognition.Neurobiology of aging · 2020Article
- Response-level processing during visual feature search: Effects of frontoparietal activation and adult age.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2020Article
- Functional networks underlying item and source memory: shared and distinct network components and age-related differences.Neurobiology of aging · 2018Article
- Search and recovery of autobiographical and laboratory memories: Shared and distinct neural components.Neuropsychologia · 2018Article
- Abnormal degree centrality in chronic users of codeine-containing cough syrups: A resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study.NeuroImage. Clinical · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous research suggests that age-related differences in attention reflect the interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes, but the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying this interaction remain an active area of research. Here, within a sample of community-dwelling adults 19-78 years of age, we used diffusion reaction time (RT) modeling and multivariate functional connectivity to investigate the behavioral components and whole-brain functional networks, respectively, underlying bottom-up and top-down attentional processes during conjunction visual search. During functional MRI scanning, participants completed a conjunction visual search task in which each display contained one item that was larger than the other items (i.e., a size singleton) but was not informative regarding target identity. This design allowed us to examine in the RT components and functional network measures the influence of (a) additional bottom-up guidance when the target served as the size singleton, relative to when the distractor served as the size singleton (i.e., size singleton effect) and (b) top-down processes during target detection (i.e., target detection effect; target present vs. absent trials). We found that the size singleton effect (i.e., increased bottom-up guidance) was associated with RT components related to decision and nondecision processes, but these effects did not vary with age. Also, a modularity analysis revealed that frontoparietal module connectivity was important for both the size singleton and target detection effects, but this module became central to the networks through different mechanisms for each effect. Lastly, participants 42 years of age and older, in service of the target detection effect, relied more on between-frontoparietal module connections. Our results further elucidate mechanisms through which frontoparietal regions support attentional control and how these mechanisms vary in relation to adult age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.