Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28476577›Full record

ArticleBone2017

Utility of quantitative micro-computed tomographic analysis in zebrafish to define gene function during skeletogenesis.

Julia F Charles, Meera Sury, Kelly Tsang, Katia Urso, Katrin Henke, Yue Huang, Ruby Russell, Jeffrey Duryea, Matthew P Harris

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Function and Regulation of celsr1a in Skeletal Age-associated Homeostasis and Repair in Zebrafish.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. MicroCT Scanning and Analysis of the Zebrafish Skeleton.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  8. Standardization of bone morphometry and mineral density assessments in zebrafish and other small laboratory fishes using X-ray radiography and micro-computed tomography.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. High Bone Mass Disorders: New Insights From Connecting the Clinic and the Bench.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. ZebrafishBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A New Zebrafish Model for Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julia F CharlesDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States. Electronic address: jfcharles@partners.org.
Meera SuryDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, United States; Department of Orthopaedics, Boston Children's Hospital, United States; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States.
Kelly TsangDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States.
Katia UrsoDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States.
Katrin HenkeDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, United States; Department of Orthopaedics, Boston Children's Hospital, United States.
Yue HuangDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, United States; Department of Orthopaedics, Boston Children's Hospital, United States.
Ruby RussellDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States.
Jeffrey DuryeaDepartment of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, United States.
Matthew P HarrisDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, United States; Department of Orthopaedics, Boston Children's Hospital, United States. Electronic address: harris@genetics.med.harvard.edu.
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Anatomical atlas and transgenic toolkit for late skull formation in zebrafishU01DE024434 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FISHER, SHANNON, HARRIS, MATTHEW P · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Regulation of osteoclast biology by anion exchanger SLC4A2 in mouse and human sysR01AR060363 · NIAMS · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CHARLES, JULIA F · 2011 to 2015
$1.9M
Osteoclast precursors in bone homeostasis and inflammatory arthritisK08AR062590 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES, JULIA F · 2012 to 2016
$619k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIAMS NIH HHS K08 AR062590NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR060363NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE024434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish is a powerful experimental model to investigate the genetic and morphologic basis of vertebrate development. Analysis of skeletogenesis in this fish is challenging as a result of the small size of the developing and adult zebrafish. Many of the bones of small fishes such as the zebrafish and medaka are quite thin, precluding many standard assays of bone quality and morphometrics commonly used on bones of larger animals. Microcomputed tomography (microCT) is a common imaging technique used for detailed analysis of the skeleton of the zebrafish and determination of mutant phenotypes. However, the utility of this modality for analysis of the zebrafish skeleton, and the effect of inherent variation among individual zebrafish, including variables such as sex, age and strain, is not well understood. Given the increased use and accessibility of microCT, we set out to define the sensitivity of microCT methods in developing and adult zebrafish. We assessed skeletal shape and density measures in the developing vertebrae and parasphenoid of the skull base. We found most skeletal variables are tightly correlated to standard length, but that at later growth stages (>3months) there are age dependent effects on some skeletal measures. Further we find modest strain but not sex differences in skeletal measures. These data suggest that the appropriate control for assessing mutant phenotypes should be age and strain matched, ideally a wild-type sibling. By analyzing two mutants exhibiting skeletal dysplasia, we show that microCT imaging can be a sensitive method to quantify distinct skeletal parameters of adults. Finally, as developing zebrafish skeletons remain difficult to resolve by radiographic means, we define a contrast agent specific for bone that enhances resolution at early stages, permitting detailed morphometric analysis of the forming skeleton. This increased capability for detection extends the use of this imaging modality to leverage the zebrafish model to understand the development causes of skeletal dysplasias.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone and BonesOryziasPhenotypeX-Ray MicrotomographyZebrafishZebrafish ProteinsZebrafish ProteinsBoneBone matrix specific contrastDevelopmentMicrocomputed tomographyPhenotypic variationZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID28476577
PMCPMC5512604
OpenAlexW2610756228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.