Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28476271›Full record

Observational studyJournal of substance abuse treatment2017

Alcohol brief intervention in primary care: Blood pressure outcomes in hypertensive patients.

Felicia W Chi, Constance M Weisner, Jennifer R Mertens, Thekla B Ross, Stacy A Sterling

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Evaluation of a Pilot Implementation to Integrate Alcohol-Related Care within Primary Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felicia W ChiDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Electronic address: Felicia.W.Chi@kp.org.
Constance M WeisnerDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, 401 Parnassus Ave., San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. Electronic address: Constance.Weisner@kp.org.
Jennifer R MertensAurora Public Schools Division of Accountability and Research, Educational Services Center 1, 15701 E. 1st Ave., Suite 112, Aurora, CO 80011, USA.
Thekla B RossDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Electronic address: Thekla.B.Ross@kp.org.
Stacy A SterlingDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Electronic address: Stacy.A.Sterling@kp.org.
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Alcohol SBIRT Implementation in an HMO: Non-Physician Providers vs. PhysiciansR01AA018660 · NIAAA · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MERTENS, JENNIFER RENE · 2010 to 2013
$2.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical trials alcohol brief intervention (BI) in adult primary care has been efficacious in reducing alcohol consumption, but we know little about its impact on health outcomes. Hypertension is a prevalent and costly chronic condition in the U.S. and worldwide, and alcohol use is a modifiable hypertension risk factor.

objectiveTo evaluate the effect of receiving BI for unhealthy drinking on blood pressure (BP) control among adult hypertensive patients by analyzing secondary data from a clustered, randomized controlled trial on alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT) implementation by primary care physicians (PCP intervention arm) and non-physician providers and medical assistants (NPP&MA intervention arm) in a large, integrated health care delivery system.

designObservational, prospective cohort study. SUBJECTS: 3811 adult hypertensive primary care patients screening positive for past-year heavy drinking at baseline, of which 1422 (37%) had an electronic health record BP measure at baseline and 18-month follow-up.

main outcome measuresChange in BP and controlled BP (systolic/diastolic BP <140/90mmHg).

resultsOverall no significant associations were found between alcohol BI and BP change at 18-month follow-up when analyzing the combined sample of subjects in both intervention arms. However, moderation analyses found that receiving BI for positive past-year unhealthy drinking was positively associated with better BP control at 18months in the PCP intervention arm, and for those with lower heavy drinking frequency and poor BP control at the index screening.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that hypertensive patients may benefit from receiving physician brief intervention for unhealthy alcohol use in primary care. Findings also highlight potential population-level benefits of alcohol BI if widely applied, suggesting a need for the development of innovative strategies to facilitate SBIRT delivery in primary care settings.

Indexed as

AgedAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholismBlood PressureCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicReferral and ConsultationRisk FactorsAlcohol screening and brief interventionBlood pressure controlHypertension

Identifiers

PMID28476271
PMCPMC5440118
OpenAlexW2597609192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.