ArticleBMC health services research2017
'Waiting for' and 'waiting in' public and private hospitals: a qualitative study of patient trust in South Australia.
Article in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed.
- Perceptions of public and private health services in Poland: findings from a 2025 nationwide survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Patient Perception of Involvement in Nursing Bedside Handover: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Article
- Combined Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Simulation for Healthcare Process Optimization: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Disparities in time to breast cancer surgery in New Zealand by level of neighbourhood deprivation: a population-based study.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- How Private Health Insurance Shapes Perceptions of Public Healthcare in Sweden.The International journal of health planning and management · 2025Article
- Ubuntu philosophy as a strategy to promote access to under-five child healthcare services.Curationis · 2025Review
- The difference in patient-centered medical experiences between public fertility care and private fertility care in China: a multicenter cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Preferences for Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up Care for Children: A Discrete Choice Experiment.The patient · 2024Article
- Patients' intention to make an up-front payment at private outpatient clinics in Malaysia as a no-show reduction method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhancing Mass Vaccination Programs with Queueing Theory and Spatial Optimization.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Assessment of Patient Waiting Time in Primary Health Care Settings in Rwanda: A Mixed-Method Study.Rwanda journal of medicine and health sciences · 2024Article
- Enhancing mass vaccination programs with queueing theory and spatial optimization.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Enhancing effective healthcare communication in Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand: Considerations for research, teaching, policy, and practice.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- Patient preferences and choices as a reflection of trust-A cluster analysis comparing postsurgical perceptions in a private and a public hospital.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Nurse managers' views regarding patients' long waiting time at community health centers in Gauteng Province, South Africa.Belitung nursing journal · 2022Article
- Health insurance in private and public health facilities in Southwestern Nigeria: what determines clients´ satisfaction with quality of service?The Pan African medical journal · 2022Article
- Factors Influencing Satisfaction with Service Delivery Among National Health Insurance Scheme Enrollees in Ibadan, Southwest Nigeria.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- Too long to wait: South Asian migrants' experiences of accessing health care in Australia.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Patient experiences of waiting times in standardised cancer patient pathways in Norway - a qualitative interview study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWaiting times for hospital appointments, treatment and/or surgery have become a major political and health service problem, leading to national maximum waiting times and policies to reduce waiting times. Quantitative studies have documented waiting times for various types of surgery and longer waiting times in public vs private hospitals. However, very little qualitative research has explored patient experiences of waiting, how this compares between public and private hospitals, and the implications for trust in hospitals and healthcare professionals. The aim of this paper is to provide a deep understanding of the impact of waiting times on patient trust in public and private hospitals.
methodsA qualitative study in South Australia, including 36 in-depth interviews (18 from public and 18 from private hospitals). Data collection occurred in 2012-13, and data were analysed using pre-coding, followed by conceptual and theoretical categorisation.
resultsParticipants differentiated between experiences of 'waiting for' (e.g. for specialist appointments and surgery) and 'waiting in' (e.g. in emergency departments and outpatient clinics) public and private hospitals. Whilst 'waiting for' public hospitals was longer than private hospitals, this was often justified and accepted by public patients (e.g. due to reduced government funding), therefore it did not lead to distrust of public hospitals. Private patients had shorter 'waiting for' hospital services, increasing their trust in private hospitals and distrust of public hospitals. Public patients also recounted many experiences of longer 'waiting in' public hospitals, leading to frustration and anxiety, although they rarely blamed or distrusted the doctors or nurses, instead blaming an underfunded system and over-worked staff. Doctors and nurses were seen to be doing their best, and therefore trustworthy.
conclusionAlthough public patients experienced longer 'waiting for' and 'waiting in' public hospitals, it did not lead to widespread distrust in public hospitals or healthcare professionals. Private patients recounted largely positive stories of reduced 'waiting for' and 'waiting in' private hospitals, and generally distrusted public hospitals. The continuing trust by public patients in the face of negative experiences may be understood as a form of exchange trust norm, in which institutional trust is based on base-level expectations of consistency and minimum standards of care and safety. The institutional trust by private patients may be understood as a form of communal trust norm, whereby trust is based on the additional and higher-level expectations of flexibility, reduced waiting and more time with healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.