Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28476042›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

The combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) and periprostatic fat thickness on multi-parametric MRI to predict the presence of prostate cancer.

Yudong Cao, Min Cao, Yuke Chen, Wei Yu, Yu Fan, Qing Liu, Ge Gao, Zheng Zhao, Xiaoying Wang, Jie Jin

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Mechanistic Insights into the Link between Obesity and Prostate Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yudong CaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Min CaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuke ChenDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei YuDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yu FanDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qing LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Ge GaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zheng ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jie JinDepartment of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peking University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the auxiliary effectiveness of periprostatic fat thickness (PPFT) on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mp-MRI) to Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) in predicting the presence of prostate cancer (PCa) and high-grade prostate cancer (HGPCa, Gleason Score ≥ 7).

resultsOverall, there were 371 patients (54.3%) with PCa and 292 patients (42.8%) with HGPCa. The mean value of PPFT was 4.04 mm. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, prostatic specific antigen (PSA), volume, PI-RADS score, and PPFT were independent predictors of PCa. All factors plus abnormal digital rectal exam were independent predictors of HGPCa. In addition, the PPFT was the independent predictor of PCa (Odds ratio [OR] 2.56, p = 0.004) and HGPCa (OR 2.70, p = 0.014) for subjects with PI-RADS grade 3. The present two nomograms based on multivariate analysis outperformed the single PI-RADS in aspects of predicting accuracy for PCa (area under the curve: 0.922 vs. 0.883, p = 0.029) and HGPCa (0.919 vs. 0.873, p = 0.007). Decision-curve analysis also indicated the favorable clinical utility of the present two nomograms. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe clinical data of 683 patients who received transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and prior mp-MRI were reviewed. PPFT was measured as the shortest perpendicular distance from the pubic symphysis to the prostate on MRI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the independent predictors of PCa and HGPCa. We also constructed two nomograms for predicting PCa and HGPCa based on the logistic regression.

conclusionThe PPFT on mp-MRI is an independent predictor of PCa and HGPCa, notably for patients with PI-RADS grade 3. The nomograms incorporated predictors of PPFT and PI-RADS demonstrated good predictive performance.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedBiopsyDecision Support TechniquesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNomogramsPrognosisProstatic NeoplasmsRisk Factorsdiagnosisnomogramperiprostatic fatPI-RADSprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID28476042
PMCPMC5546460
OpenAlexW2606941162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.