Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28475904›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2017

Perceived mHealth barriers and benefits for home-based HIV testing and counseling and other care: Qualitative findings from health officials, community health workers, and persons living with HIV in South Africa.

Alastair van Heerden, Danielle M Harris, Heidi van Rooyen, Ruanne V Barnabas, Nithya Ramanathan, Nkosinathi Ngcobo, Zukiswa Mpiyakhe, W Scott Comulada

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Healthcare Workers' Perspectives of mHealth Adoption Factors in the Developing World: Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alastair van HeerdenHuman and Social Development Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa; Developmental Pathways to Health Research Unit, School of Community Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. Electronic address: avanheerden@hsrc.ac.za.
Danielle M HarrisDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Global Center for Children and Families, University of California, Los Angeles, 10920 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 350, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States. Electronic address: dmharris@mednet.ucla.edu.
Heidi van RooyenHuman and Social Development Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa. Electronic address: hvanrooyen@hsrc.ac.za.
Ruanne V BarnabasGlobal Health and Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. Electronic address: rbarnaba@uw.edu.
Nithya RamanathanNexleaf Analytics, Los Angeles, CA, United States. Electronic address: nithyaar@gmail.com.
Nkosinathi NgcoboHuman and Social Development Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa. Electronic address: NNgcobo@hsrc.ac.za.
Zukiswa MpiyakheHuman and Social Development Research Programme, Human Sciences Research Council, South Africa. Electronic address: zmpiyakhe@hsrc.ac.za.
W Scott ComuladaDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Global Center for Children and Families, University of California, Los Angeles, 10920 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 350, Los Angeles, CA 90024, United States. Electronic address: wcomulada@mednet.ucla.edu.

Funding

UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RAPHAEL J LANDOVITZ · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
An mHealth platform for health care workers to link South Africans to HIV careR21MH106351 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI COMULADA, WARREN SCOTT, VAN HEERDEN, ALASTAIR · 2015 to 2016
$385k
NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

mHealth has been proposed to address inefficiencies in the current South African healthcare system, including home-based HIV testing and counseling (HTC) programs. Yet wide-scale adoption of mHealth has not occurred. Even as infrastructure barriers decrease, a need to better understand perceived adoption barriers by stakeholders remains. We conducted focus group discussions (FGD) in South Africa in 2016 with 10 home-based HTC field staff, 12 community health workers (CHWs) and 10 persons living with HIV (PLH). Key informant (KI) interviews were conducted with five health officials. Perceptions about current home-based HTC practices, future mHealth systems and the use of biometrics for patient identification were discussed, recorded and transcribed for qualitative analysis. Themes were based on a conceptual model for perceived mHealth service quality. Stakeholders brought up a lack of communication in sharing patient health information between clinics, between clinics and CHWs, and between clinics and patients as major barriers to care that mHealth can address. CHWs need better patient information from clinics in terms of physical location and health status to plan visitation routes and address patient needs. CHWs perceive that communication barriers create distrust towards them by clinic staff. PLH want automated appointment and medication reminders. KI see mHealth as a way to improve health information transfer to government officials to better allocate healthcare resources. Stakeholders are also optimistic about the ability for biometrics to improve patient identification but disagreed as to which biometrics would be acceptable, especially in older patients. All stakeholders provided useful information towards the development of mHealth systems. Hospitals are adopting patient-centered approaches that solicit feedback from patients and incorporate them into decision-making processes. A similar approach is needed in the development of mHealth systems. Further, such systems are critical to the successful extension of the health system from health facilities into people's homes.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdultCommunity Health WorkersCounselingDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleFocus GroupsGovernment EmployeesHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaTelemedicineBiometric authenticationHIVHome-based counseling and testingmHealthSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID28475904
PMCPMC5515289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.