Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28475754›Full record

Trial reportHealth policy and planning2017

A cluster-randomized evaluation of an intervention to increase skilled birth attendant utilization in mid- and far-western Nepal.

Bishnu P Choulagai, Sharad Onta, Narayan Subedi, Dharma N Bhatta, Binjwala Shrestha, Max Petzold, Alexandra Krettek

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health policy and planning, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Associations between early marriage and preterm delivery: Evidence from lowland Nepal.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bishnu P ChoulagaiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Sharad OntaDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Narayan SubediDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Dharma N BhattaEpidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkla, Thailand.
Binjwala ShresthaDepartment of Community Medicine and Public Health, Institute of Medicine, Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Max PetzoldHealth Metrics, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Alexandra KrettekDepartment of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skilled birth attendant (SBA) utilization is low in remote and rural areas of Nepal. We designed and implemented an evaluation to assess the effectiveness of a five-component intervention that addressed previously identified barriers to SBA services in mid- and far-western Nepal. We randomly and equally allocated 36 village development committees with low SBA utilization among 1-year intervention and control groups. The eligible participants for the survey were women that had delivered a baby within the past 12 months preceding the survey. Implementation was administered by trained health volunteers, youth groups, mothers' groups and health facility management committee members. Post-intervention, we used difference-in-differences and mixed-effects regression models to assess and analyse any increase in the utilization of skilled birth care and antenatal care (ANC) services. All analyses were done by intention to treat. Our trial registration number was ISRCTN78892490 (http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN78892490). Interviewees included 1746 and 2098 eligible women in the intervention and control groups, respectively. The 1-year intervention was effective in increasing the use of skilled birth care services (OR = 1.57; CI 1.19-2.08); however, the intervention had no effect on the utilization of ANC services. Expanding the intervention with modifications, e.g. mobilizing more active and stable community groups, ensuring adequate human resources and improving quality of services as well as longer or repeated interventions will help achieve greater effect in increasing the utilization of SBA.

Indexed as

AdultCluster AnalysisDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyNepalPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancyPrenatal CareRural Health ServicesCluster randomized controlled trialepidemiologyevaluationevidence-based policyhealth services researchinterventionmaternal healthNepalnewborn healthpublic healthskilled birth attendant

Identifiers

PMID28475754
PMCPMC5886087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.