Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28475611›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Low concentration DNA extraction and recovery using a silica solid phase.

Constantinos Katevatis, Andy Fan, Catherine M Klapperich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A rapid purification method for trace amounts of cell-free DNA in urine.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Constantinos KatevatisDivision of Materials Science and Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0765-4328
Andy FanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Catherine M KlapperichDivision of Materials Science and Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

Center for Innovation in Point of Care Technologies for the Future of Cancer CareU54EB015403 · NIBIB · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KLAPPERICH, CATHERINE M. · 2012 to 2016
$8.9M
Rapid Molecular Diagnostic for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea at the Point-of-CareR56AI113927 · NIAID · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI KLAPPERICH, CATHERINE M. · 2014 to 2014
$404k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI113927NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB015403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA extraction from clinical samples is commonly achieved with a silica solid phase extraction column in the presence of a chaotrope. Versions of these protocols have been adapted for point of care (POC) diagnostic devices in miniaturized platforms, but commercial kits require a high amount of input DNA. Thus, when the input clinical sample contains less than 1 μg of total DNA, the target-specific DNA recovery from most of these protocols is low without supplementing the sample with exogenous carrier DNA. In fact, many clinical samples used in the development of POC diagnostics often exhibit target DNA concentrations as low as 3 ng/mL. With the broader goal of improving the yield and efficiency of nucleic acid-based POC devices for dilute samples, we investigated both DNA adsorption and recovery from silica particles by using 1 pg- 1 μg of DNA with a set of adsorption and elution buffers ranging in pH and chaotropic presence. In terms of adsorption, we found that low pH and the presence of chaotropic guanidinium thiocyanate (GuSCN) enhanced DNA-silica adsorption. When eluting with a standard low-salt, high-pH buffer, > 70% of DNA was unrecoverable, except when DNA was initially adsorbed with 5 M GuSCN at pH 5.2. Unrecovered DNA was either not initially adsorbed or irreversibly bound on the silica surface. Recovery was improved when eluting with 95°C formamide and 1 M NaOH, which suggested that DNA-silica-chaotrope interactions are dominated by hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen bonding. While heated formamide and NaOH are non-ideal elution buffers for practical POC devices, the salient results are important for engineering a set of optimized reagents that could maximize nucleic acid recovery from a microfluidic DNA-silica-chaotrope system.

Indexed as

AdsorptionDNAHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationHydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsLimit of DetectionMiniaturizationPolymerase Chain ReactionSilicon DioxideDNASilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID28475611
PMCPMC5419563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.