Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28475606›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Shaping innovations in long-term care for stroke survivors with multimorbidity through stakeholder engagement.

Euan Sadler, Talya Porat, Iain Marshall, Uy Hoang, Vasa Curcin, Charles D A Wolfe, Christopher McKevitt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Patient co-design of digital health storytelling tools for multimorbidity: A phenomenological study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Euan SadlerDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3827-224X
Talya PoratDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Iain MarshallDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Uy HoangDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Vasa CurcinDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Charles D A WolfeDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Christopher McKevittDivision of Health and Social Care Research, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
King's College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N015185/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke, like many long-term conditions, tends to be managed in isolation of its associated risk factors and multimorbidity. With increasing access to clinical and research data there is the potential to combine data from a variety of sources to inform interventions to improve healthcare. A 'Learning Health System' (LHS) is an innovative model of care which transforms integrated data into knowledge to improve healthcare. The objective of this study is to develop a process of engaging stakeholders in the use of clinical and research data to co-produce potential solutions, informed by a LHS, to improve long-term care for stroke survivors with multimorbidity.

methodsWe used a stakeholder engagement study design informed by co-production principles to engage stakeholders, including service users, carers, general practitioners and other health and social care professionals, service managers, commissioners of services, policy makers, third sector representatives and researchers. Over a 10 month period we used a range of methods including stakeholder group meetings, focus groups, nominal group techniques (priority setting and consensus building) and interviews. Qualitative data were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically.

results37 participants took part in the study. The concept of how data might drive intervention development was difficult to convey and understand. The engagement process led to four priority areas for needs for data and information being identified by stakeholders: 1) improving continuity of care; 2) improving management of mental health consequences; 3) better access to health and social care; and 4) targeting multiple risk factors. These priorities informed preliminary design interventions. The final choice of intervention was agreed by consensus, informed by consideration of the gap in evidence and local service provision, and availability of robust data. This shaped a co-produced decision support tool to improve secondary prevention after stroke for further development.

conclusionsStakeholder engagement to identify data-driven solutions is feasible but requires resources. While a number of potential interventions were identified, the final choice rested not just on stakeholder priorities but also on data availability. Further work is required to evaluate the impact and implementation of data-driven interventions for long-term stroke survivors.

Indexed as

CaregiversLong-Term CareQuality ImprovementSurvivorsFocus GroupsHumansQualitative ResearchStroke

Identifiers

PMID28475606
PMCPMC5419597
OpenAlexW2610242902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.