Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28475577›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2017

Hairless-binding deficient Suppressor of Hairless alleles reveal Su(H) protein levels are dependent on complex formation with Hairless.

Heiko Praxenthaler, Anja C Nagel, Adriana Schulz, Mirjam Zimmermann, Markus Meier, Hannes Schmid, Anette Preiss, Dieter Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. An RBPJ-Cells · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Overexpression of theHereditas · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heiko PraxenthalerInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Anja C NagelInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Adriana SchulzInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9169-4057
Mirjam ZimmermannInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Markus MeierInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Hannes SchmidInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Anette PreissInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.
Dieter MaierInstitute of Genetics (240), University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4460-0959

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell fate choices during metazoan development are driven by the highly conserved Notch signalling pathway. Notch receptor activation results in release of the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) that acts as transcriptional co-activator of the DNA-binding protein CSL. In the absence of signal, a repressor complex consisting of CSL bound to co-repressors silences Notch target genes. The Drosophila repressor complex contains the fly CSL orthologue Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] and Hairless (H). The Su(H)-H crystal structure revealed a large conformational change within Su(H) upon H binding, precluding interactions with NICD. Based on the structure, several sites in Su(H) and H were determined to specifically engage in complex formation. In particular, three mutations in Su(H) were identified that affect interactions with the repressor H but not the activator NICD. To analyse the effects these mutants have on normal fly development, we introduced these mutations into the native Su(H) locus by genome engineering. We show that the three H-binding deficient Su(H) alleles behave similarly. As these mutants lack the ability to form the repressor complex, Notch signalling activity is strongly increased in homozygotes, comparable to a complete loss of H activity. Unexpectedly, we find that the abundance of the three mutant Su(H) protein variants is altered, as is that of wild type Su(H) protein in the absence of H protein. In the presence of NICD, however, Su(H) mutant protein persists. Apparently, Su(H) protein levels depend on the interactions with H as well as with NICD. Based on these results, we propose that in vivo levels of Su(H) protein are stabilised by interactions with transcription-regulator complexes.

Indexed as

MutationAllelesAnimalsBinding SitesDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsProtein BindingReceptors, NotchRepressor ProteinsSignal TransductionTranscription FactorsDrosophila ProteinsH protein, DrosophilaReceptors, NotchRepressor ProteinsSu(H) protein, DrosophilaTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28475577
PMCPMC5438185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.