Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28474470›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2017

Modulation of 7 T fMRI Signal in the Cerebellar Cortex and Nuclei During Acquisition, Extinction, and Reacquisition of Conditioned Eyeblink Responses.

Thomas M Ernst, Markus Thürling, Sarah Müller, Fabian Kahl, Stefan Maderwald, Marc Schlamann, Henk-Jan Boele, Sebastiaan K E Koekkoek, Jörn Diedrichsen, Chris I De Zeeuw and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Thomas M ErnstDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2170-9241
Markus ThürlingDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Sarah MüllerDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Fabian KahlDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
Stefan MaderwaldErwin L. Hahn Institute for MRI, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Marc SchlamannDepartment for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, Essen University Hospital, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Henk-Jan BoeleDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sebastiaan K E KoekkoekDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Jörn DiedrichsenDepartment for Computer Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark E LaddErwin L. Hahn Institute for MRI, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Dagmar TimmannDepartment of Neurology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Classical delay eyeblink conditioning is likely the most commonly used paradigm to study cerebellar learning. As yet, few studies have focused on extinction and savings of conditioned eyeblink responses (CRs). Saving effects, which are reflected in a reacquisition after extinction that is faster than the initial acquisition, suggest that learned associations are at least partly preserved during extinction. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that acquisition-related plasticity is nihilated during extinction in the cerebellar cortex, but retained in the cerebellar nuclei, allowing for faster reacquisition. Changes of 7 T functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) signals were investigated in the cerebellar cortex and nuclei of young and healthy human subjects. Main effects of acquisition, extinction, and reacquisition against rest were calculated in conditioned stimulus-only trials. First-level β values were determined for a spherical region of interest (ROI) around the acquisition peak voxel in lobule VI, and dentate and interposed nuclei ipsilateral to the unconditioned stimulus. In the cerebellar cortex and nuclei, fMRI signals were significantly lower in extinction compared to acquisition and reacquisition, but not significantly different between acquisition and reacquisition. These findings are consistent with the theory of bidirectional learning in both the cerebellar cortex and nuclei. It cannot explain, however, why conditioned responses reappear almost immediately in reacquisition following extinction. Although the present data do not exclude that part of the initial memory remains in the cerebellum in extinction, future studies should also explore changes in extracerebellar regions as a potential substrate of saving effects. Hum Brain Mapp 38:3957-3974, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAnalysis of VarianceBlinkingBrain MappingCerebellar CortexCerebellar NucleiConditioning, EyelidExtinction, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adultassociative learningcerebellar imagingdeep cerebellar nucleidelay conditioninghuman

Identifiers

PMID28474470
PMCPMC6866767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.