Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28474324›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017

Role of Imaging in Cardio-Oncology.

Erick Avelar, Caitlin R Strickland, Guido Rosito

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Measurement of Ejection Fraction by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography to Monitor Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cardiotoxicity of Anticancer Therapeutics.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erick AvelarDivision of Cardiology, Oconee Heart and Vascular Center, Augusta University/University of Georgia Medical Partnership, 2470 Daniells Bridge Road, Bldg. 200, Ste. 251, Athens, GA, 30606, USA. eavelar@augusta.edu.
Caitlin R StricklandOconee Heart and Vascular Center, The Exchange, 2470 Daniells Bridge Road, Bldg. 200, Suite 251, Athens, GA, 30606, USA.
Guido RositoDivision of Cardiology, UFCSPA (Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre), Rua Itororó 160/1305, POA, RS, 90110290, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre · BRUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementRecent advances in cancer treatment and research have greatly improved survival rates for patients with cancer. However, many of these cancer survivors are developing cardiac disease-most commonly heart failure as a result of this treatment. Certain chemotherapeutic agents, including anthracyclines and trastuzumab, have been linked to cardiotoxicity-induced cardiomyopathy in cancer patients. It has been reported as early as during infusion and as late as several years following treatment. Radiation therapy, particularly to the left breast, has also been linked to cardiac disease. The responsibility of cardiac monitoring has traditionally fallen on oncologists using assessment of LVEF through multigated acquisition (MUGA) scans or echocardiograms. The "formal" definition of cardiotoxicity, as a 5 to 10% decrease in LVEF from its baseline, even though not validated, is currently used by clinicians to alter treatment, but it has been recently challenged, as a possible irreversible late stage of a myocardial insult. Furthermore, it falls into the interobserver variability range of echocardiography. The growing field of medicine called cardio-oncology is based on emerging research that has shown that more advanced imaging modalities can help detect cardiotoxicity early, allowing the patient to receive treatment and avoid developing heart failure from cancer treatment. While traditional imaging still has its place in cardiac monitoring, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the most accurate and detailed imaging modality available to assess cardiotoxicity. Our own pilot cardiac MRI study suggests that a normal left ventricular remodeling to chemotherapy, when patients have not developed heart failure symptoms, could occur over time. Perhaps, knowing a baseline normal response could help us to define a more accurate definition of cardiotoxicity by CMR. Here, we discuss various imaging modalities and emerging techniques that can assist in detecting early signs of cardiotoxicity and thus reduce the incidence of cardiac disease in cancer survivors.

Indexed as

CancerCancer treatmentCardiac imaging-chemotherapyCardiac MRICardiomyopathyCardiotoxicityEchocardiography

Identifiers

PMID28474324
OpenAlexW2610728456

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.