Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28474301›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2017

Risk score model of type 2 diabetes prediction for rural Chinese adults: the Rural Deqing Cohort Study.

X Chen, Z Wu, Y Chen, X Wang, J Zhu, N Wang, Q Jiang, C Fu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

X ChenSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Z WuSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Y ChenSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
X WangDeqing County Center of Disease Prevention and Control, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
J ZhuDeqing County Center of Disease Prevention and Control, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China.
N WangSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Q JiangSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
C FuSchool of Public Health, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety and Pudong Institute of Preventive Medicine, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. fcw@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0966-8552

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81473038Shanghai 3-Year Public Health Action Plan GWTD2015S04Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project of Public Health 15GWZK80101
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRisk score (RS) model is a cost-effective tool to identify adults who are at high risk for diabetes. This study was to develop an RS model of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) prediction specifically for rural Chinese adults.

methodsA prospective whole cohort study (n = 28,251) and a sub-cohort study (n = 3043) were conducted from 2006-2014 and 2006-2008 to 2015 in rural Deqing, China. All participants were free of T2DM at baseline. Incident T2DM cases were identified through electronic health records, self-reported and fasting plasma glucose testing for the sub-cohort, respectively. RS models were constructed with coefficients (β) of Cox regression. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were plotted and the area under the curve (AUC) reflected the discriminating accuracy of an RS model.

resultsBy 2015, the incidence of T2DM was 3.3 and 7.7 per 1000 person-years in the whole cohort and the sub-cohort, respectively. Based on data from the whole cohort, the non-invasive RS model included age (4 points), overweight (2 points), obesity (4 points), family history of T2DM (3 points), meat diet (3 points), and hypertension (2 points). The plus-fasting plasma glucose (FPG) model added impaired fasting glucose (4 points). The AUC was 0.705 with a positive predictive value of 2.5% for the non-invasive model, and for the plus-FPG model the AUC was 0.754 with a positive predictive value of 2.5%. These models performed better as compared with 12 existing RS models for the study population.

conclusionsOur non-invasive RS model can be used to identify individuals who are at high risk of T2DM as a simple, fast, and cost-effective tool for rural Chinese adults.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAdultArea Under CurveBiomarkersBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexChinaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrediabetic StatePrognosisBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanCohort studyRisk scoreRural ChinaType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.