Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28474205›Full record

ArticleCell stress & chaperones2017

Chaperone co-inducer BGP-15 inhibits histone deacetylases and enhances the heat shock response through increased chromatin accessibility.

Marek A Budzyński, Tim Crul, Samu V Himanen, Noemi Toth, Ferenc Otvos, Lea Sistonen, Laszlo Vigh

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell stress & chaperones, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. BGP-15 ameliorates sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy via SIRT3/SOD2-associated antioxidant signaling and suppression of myocardial inflammation.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Diabetes, Protein Misfolding, and Heat Stress: Molecular Insights and Translational Perspectives.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Quantitative Comparison of HSF1 Activators.Molecular biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Marek A BudzyńskiFaculty of Science and Engineering, Cell Biology, Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
Tim CrulBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6053-7016
Samu V HimanenFaculty of Science and Engineering, Cell Biology, Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520, Turku, Finland.
Noemi TothBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Ferenc OtvosBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, 6726, Hungary.
Lea SistonenFaculty of Science and Engineering, Cell Biology, Åbo Akademi University, FI-20520, Turku, Finland. lea.sistonen@abo.fi.
Laszlo VighBiological Research Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Szeged, 6726, Hungary. vigh@brc.hu.
HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUÅbo Akademi University · FI

Funding

Hungarian Basic Research Fund MB08-BHungarian Scientific Research Fund OTKA NN 111006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defects in cellular protein homeostasis are associated with many severe and prevalent pathological conditions such as neurodegenerative diseases, muscle dystrophies, and metabolic disorders. One way to counteract these defects is to improve the protein homeostasis capacity through induction of the heat shock response. Despite numerous attempts to develop strategies for chemical activation of the heat shock response by heat shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1), the underlying mechanisms of drug candidates' mode of action are poorly understood. To lower the threshold for the heat shock response activation, we used the chaperone co-inducer BGP-15 that was previously shown to have beneficial effects on several proteinopathic disease models. We found that BGP-15 treatment combined with heat stress caused a substantial increase in HSF1-dependent heat shock protein 70 (HSPA1A/B) expression already at a febrile range of temperatures. Moreover, BGP-15 alone inhibited the activity of histone deacetylases (HDACs), thereby increasing chromatin accessibility at multiple genomic loci including the stress-inducible HSPA1A. Intriguingly, treatment with well-known potent HDAC inhibitors trichostatin A and valproic acid enhanced the heat shock response and improved cytoprotection. These results present a new pharmacological strategy for restoring protein homeostasis by inhibiting HDACs, increasing chromatin accessibility, and lowering the threshold for heat shock response activation.

Indexed as

AnimalsCarrier ProteinsCell LineCell SurvivalChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationCo-Repressor ProteinsHeat-Shock ResponseHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMiceMolecular ChaperonesBGP 15Carrier ProteinsChromatinCo-Repressor ProteinsDaxx protein, mouseHeat Shock Transcription FactorsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistone DeacetylasesHsf1 protein, mouseHSP40 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP70 Heat-Shock ProteinsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMolecular ChaperonesNotch4 protein, mouseNuclear ProteinsOximesPiperidinesReceptor, Notch4Heat shock factor protein 1 (HSF1)Histone deacetylase (HDAC)Stress responseTranscriptionTSAVPA

Identifiers

PMID28474205
PMCPMC5573690
OpenAlexW2610611479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.