ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2017
Homogenous scaffold-based cranial/skull implant modelling and structural analysis-unit cell algorithm-meshless approach.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 3D-Printed Flat-Bone-Mimetic Bioceramic Scaffolds for Cranial Restoration.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This computational study explores a unique modelling approach of the cranial implant, homogenous scaffold algorithm and meshless method, respectively. This meshless method is employed to review the implant underneath intracranial pressure (ICP) conditions with a standard ICP range of 7 mm of Hg to 15 mm of Hg. The algorithm is used to introduce uniform porosity within the implant enabling the implant behaviour with respect to ICP conditions. However, increase in the porosity leads to variation in deformation and equivalent stress, respectively. The meshless approach provides a valuable insight in order to know the effect of total deformation and equivalent stress (von Mises stress) and replaces the standard meshing strategies. The patient CT data (computed tomography) is processed in MIMICS software to get the mesh model. An entirely unique modelling approach is developed to model the cranial implant with the assistance of the Rhinoceros software. This modelling methodology is the easiest one and addressing both the symmetrical and asymmetrical defects. The implant is embedded in a unit cell-based porous structure with the help of an algorithm, and this algorithm is simple to manage the consistency in porosity and pore size of the scaffold. Totally six types of implants are modelled with variation in porosity and replicate the original cranial bone. Among six implants, Type 2 (porosity 82.62%) and Type 5 (porosity 45.73%) implants are analysed with the meshless approach under ICP. The total deformation and equivalent stress (von Mises stress) of porous implants are compared with the solid implant under same ICP conditions. Consequently, distinctive materials are used for structural analysis such as titanium alloy (Ti6Al4V) and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), respectively. The deformation and equivalent stress (von Mises stress) results are obtained through the structural analysis. It was observed from the results that the titanium-based solid implant is the best implant in all aspects, while considering weight and osseointegration PEEK-based Type 5 implant is the best one. A novel free-form closed curve network (FCN) technique is successfully developed to model a cranial implant for symmetrical and asymmetrical defects. The porous implant is adequately modelled through the unit cell algorithm and analysed through meshless approach. The implementation of 3D printed component will allow physicians to gain knowledge and successfully plan the preoperative surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28474182What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.