Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28474167›Full record

ArticleBrain topography2017

Effects of Stimulus Size and Contrast on the Initial Primary Visual Cortical Response in Humans.

Nigel Gebodh, M Isabel Vanegas, Simon P Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain topography, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nigel GebodhDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
M Isabel VanegasDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Simon P KellyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The City College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. spkell@gmail.com.
City College of New York · USUniversity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Electrophysiological indices of task-dependent attentional biasing in humansSC2GM099626 · NIGMS · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI KELLY, SIMON · 2012 to 2014
$448k
NIGMS NIH HHS SC2 GM099626
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of intracranial electrophysiological investigation into the primary visual cortex (V1) have produced many fundamental insights into the computations carried out in low-level visual circuits of the brain. Some of the most important work has been simply concerned with the precise measurement of neural response variations as a function of elementary stimulus attributes such as contrast and size. Surprisingly, such simple but fundamental characterization of V1 responses has not been carried out in human electrophysiology. Here we report such a detailed characterization for the initial "C1" component of the scalp-recorded visual evoked potential (VEP). The C1 is known to be dominantly generated by initial afferent activation in V1, but is difficult to record reliably due to interindividual anatomical variability. We used pattern-pulse multifocal VEP mapping to identify a stimulus position that activates the left lower calcarine bank in each individual, and afterwards measured robust negative C1s over posterior midline scalp to gratings presented sequentially at that location. We found clear and systematic increases in C1 peak amplitude and decreases in peak latency with increasing size as well as with increasing contrast. With a sample of 15 subjects and ~180 trials per condition, reliable C1 amplitudes of -0.46 µV were evoked at as low a contrast as 3.13% and as large as -4.82 µV at 100% contrast, using stimuli of 3.33° diameter. A practical implication is that by placing sufficiently-sized stimuli to target favorable calcarine cortical loci, robust V1 responses can be measured at contrasts close to perceptual thresholds, which could greatly facilitate principled studies of early visual perception and attention.

Indexed as

AdultAttentionBrainBrain MappingContrast SensitivityElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualFemaleHumansMaleOccipital LobePhotic StimulationVisual CortexVisual PerceptionYoung AdultC1Calcarine sulcusPrimary visual cortexStimulus sizeVisual contrastVisual evoked potential

Identifiers

PMID28474167
PMCPMC5508105
OpenAlexW2610340906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.