Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28474129›Full record

Trial reportGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2017

Impact of eye-tracking technology on OCT-angiography imaging quality in age-related macular degeneration.

J L Lauermann, M Treder, P Heiduschka, C R Clemens, N Eter, F Alten

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Wearable Near-Eye Tracking Technologies for Health: A Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Optical coherence tomography angiography: a review of the current literature.The Journal of international medical research · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J L LauermannDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
M TrederDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
P HeiduschkaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
C R ClemensDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
N EterDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany.
F AltenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Muenster Medical Center, Domagkstrasse 15, 48149, Muenster, Germany. florian.alten@ukmuenster.de.
University of Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of eye-tracking (ET) technology on optical coherence tomography angiography (OCT-A) image quality and manifestation of motion artifacts in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

methodsIn a prospective trial, multimodal retinal imaging including OCT-A was performed in 30 patients (78.97 ± 9.7 years) affected by different stages of AMD. Central 3 × 3 mm

resultsEight patients had early and eight patients had intermediate stages of AMD. Four patients had an atrophic late stage and ten patients an exudative stage of the disease. SSI was 53.55 with inactive and 57.18 with active ET (p = 0.0005). Coefficients of variability of VD between the first and second measurement were 8.9% with inactive and 5.7% with active ET. Mean image acquisition time was 15.97 s (active ET: 22.88 s, p < 0.001). Presence of motion artifacts was significantly higher with inactive ET (mean MAS 3.27 vs. 1.93; p < 0.0001). MAS correlated with AMD disease stage [p = 0.0031 (inactive ET) and p < 0.0001 (active ET)] and with SSI (p = 0.0072 and p = 0.0006).

conclusionsIn patients with AMD, active ET technology offers an improved image quality in OCT-A imaging regarding presence of motion artifacts at the expense of higher acquisition time.

Indexed as

ArtifactsAgedFemaleFluorescein AngiographyFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsRetinal VesselsTomography, Optical CoherenceWet Macular DegenerationAge-related macular degenerationEye trackingImaging artifactsMotion artifactsOCT-angiographyOptical coherence tomography angiographySpectral-domain optical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID28474129
OpenAlexW2610774487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.