Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28474009›Full record

ArticleACS omega2017

Hamming Distance as a Concept in DNA Molecular Recognition.

Mina Mohammadi-Kambs, Kathrin Hölz, Mark M Somoza, Albrecht Ott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mina Mohammadi-KambsBiological Experimental Physics, Saarland University, Campus B2.1, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.
Kathrin HölzInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14 (UZA II), 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Mark M SomozaInstitute of Inorganic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Vienna, Althanstraße 14 (UZA II), 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Albrecht OttBiological Experimental Physics, Saarland University, Campus B2.1, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA microarrays constitute an in vitro example system of a highly crowded molecular recognition environment. Although they are widely applied in many biological applications, some of the basic mechanisms of the hybridization processes of DNA remain poorly understood. On a microarray, cross-hybridization arises from similarities of sequences that may introduce errors during the transmission of information. Experimentally, we determine an appropriate distance, called minimum Hamming distance, in which the sequences of a set differ. By applying an algorithm based on a graph-theoretical method, we find large orthogonal sets of sequences that are sufficiently different not to exhibit any cross-hybridization. To create such a set, we first derive an analytical solution for the number of sequences that include at least four guanines in a row for a given sequence length and eliminate them from the list of candidate sequences. We experimentally confirm the orthogonality of the largest possible set with a size of 23 for the length of 7. We anticipate our work to be a starting point toward the study of signal propagation in highly competitive environments, besides its obvious application in DNA high throughput experiments.

Identifiers

PMID28474009
PMCPMC5410656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.