Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28473840›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2017

Cowpea (

Piebiep Goufo, José M Moutinho-Pereira, Tiago F Jorge, Carlos M Correia, Manuela R Oliveira, Eduardo A S Rosa, Carla António, Henrique Trindade

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
23.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 193 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of Omics Technologies for Cowpea Improvement.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Potassium Humate andPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Speed breeding enhances crop resilience and productivity in a changing climate.Molecular breeding : new strategies in plant improvement · 2025
    Review
  10. Local Forms ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Cowpea (Frontiers in plant science · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Piebiep GoufoCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila Real, Portugal.
José M Moutinho-PereiraCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila Real, Portugal.
Tiago F JorgePlant Metabolomics Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de LisboaOeiras, Portugal.
Carlos M CorreiaCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila Real, Portugal.
Manuela R OliveiraUnidade de Biotecnologia e Recursos Genéticos, Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e VeterináriaOeiras, Portugal.
Eduardo A S RosaCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila Real, Portugal.
Carla AntónioPlant Metabolomics Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de LisboaOeiras, Portugal.
Henrique TrindadeCentre for the Research and Technology of Agro-Environment and Biological Sciences, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto DouroVila Real, Portugal.
University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTInstituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants usually tolerate drought by producing organic solutes, which can either act as compatible osmolytes for maintaining turgor, or radical scavengers for protecting cellular functions. However, these two properties of organic solutes are often indistinguishable during stress progression. This study looked at individualizing properties of osmotic adjustment vs. osmoprotection in plants, using cowpea as the model species. Two cultivars were grown in well-watered soil, drought conditions, or drought followed by rewatering through fruit formation. Osmoadaptation was investigated in leaves and roots using photosynthetic traits, water homoeostasis, inorganic ions, and primary and secondary metabolites. Multifactorial analyses indicated allocation of high quantities of amino acids, sugars, and proanthocyanidins into roots, presumably linked to their role in growth and initial stress perception. Physiological and metabolic changes developed in parallel and drought/recovery responses showed a progressive acclimation of the cowpea plant to stress. Of the 88 metabolites studied, proline, galactinol, and a quercetin derivative responded the most to drought as highlighted by multivariate analyses, and their correlations with yield indicated beneficial effects. These metabolites accumulated differently in roots, but similarly in leaves, suggesting a more conservative strategy to cope with drought in the aerial parts. Changes in these compounds roughly reflected energy investment in protective mechanisms, although the ability of plants to adjust osmotically through inorganic ions uptake could not be discounted.

Indexed as

adaptationchlorophyll fluorescencecowpeadroughtgas exchangemetabolite profilingmetabolomeosmotic adjustment

Identifiers

PMID28473840
PMCPMC5397532
OpenAlexW2610054082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.