Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28473524›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

A realist evaluation of patients' decisions to deprescribe in the EMPOWER trial.

Philippe Martin, Cara Tannenbaum

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01148186 phase4terminatednot on this map

The Patient as a Driver of Change: an Intervention Study to Reduce the Use and Impact of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Among Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Geriatrie de MontrealRan2010 to 2013Enrolled300ConditionsPolypharmacy, Incontinence, Insomnia, AnxietyArmsknowledge transfer tool
NCT04855578 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

GABA-WHY Study: Deprescription of Gabapentinoids in Medical Inpatients

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health CentreRan2021 to 2023Enrolled160ConditionsPolypharmacy, Gabapentin, PregabalinArmsIn-Hopsital Patient Educational Brochure, Physician Education about Gabapentinoid Prescription
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Understanding the Role of Communication in Deprescribing Behavior Change.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Meclizine Use and Subsequent Falls Among Patients With Dizziness.JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery · 2025
    Article
  16. Assessing Older Adults' Readiness for Adopting Fall Prevention Recommendations Using the Transtheoretical Stages of Change.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Philippe MartinFaculty of Pharmacy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Cara TannenbaumInstitut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal · CAUniversité de Montréal · CA

Funding

CIHR OTG-88591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSuccessful mechanisms for engaging patients in the deprescribing process remain unknown but may include: (1) triggering motivation to deprescribe by increasing patients' knowledge and concern about medications; (2) building capacity to taper by augmenting self-efficacy and (3) creating opportunities to discuss and receive support for deprescribing from a healthcare provider. We tested these mechanisms during theEliminating Medications through Patient Ownership of End Results (EMPOWER) () trial and investigated the contexts that led to positive and negative deprescribing outcomes.

designA realist evaluation using a sequential mixed methods approach, conducted alongside the EMPOWER randomised clinical trial.

settingCommunity, Quebec, Canada.

participants261 older chronic benzodiazepine consumers, who received the EMPOWER intervention and had complete 6-month follow-up data.

interventionMailed deprescribing brochure on benzodiazepines. MEASUREMENTS: Motivation (intent to discuss deprescribing; change in knowledge test score; change in beliefs about the risk-benefits of benzodiazepines, measured with the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire), capacity (self-efficacy for tapering) and opportunity (support from a physician or pharmacist).

resultsThe intervention triggered the motivation to deprescribe among 167 (n=64%) participants (mean age 74.6 years±6.3, 72% women), demonstrated by improved knowledge (risk difference, 58.50% (95% CI 46.98% to 67.44%)) and increased concern about taking benzodiazepines (risk difference, 67.67% (95% CI 57.36% to 74.91%)). Those who attempted to taper exhibited increased self-efficacy (risk difference, 56.90% (95% CI 45.41% to 65.77%)). Contexts where the deprescribing mechanisms failed included lack of support from a healthcare provider, a focus on short-term quality of life, intolerance to withdrawal symptoms and perceived poor health.

conclusionDeprescribing mechanisms that target patient motivation and capacity to deprescribe yield successful outcomes in contexts where healthcare providers are supportive, and patients do not have internal competing desires to remain on drug therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01148186.

Indexed as

BenzodiazepinesClinical Decision-MakingDeprescriptionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services for the AgedHypnotics and SedativesAgedFemaleHumansMaleMotivationPamphletsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Education as TopicQuebecRisk AssessmentBenzodiazepinesHypnotics and SedativesbenzodiazepinesdeprescribingEMPOWERmechanismsrealist evaluation

Identifiers

PMID28473524
PMCPMC5566584
OpenAlexW2610613993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.