Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28473509›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Why do patients seek primary medical care in emergency departments? An ethnographic exploration of access to general practice.

Fiona MacKichan, Emer Brangan, Lesley Wye, Kath Checkland, Daniel Lasserson, Alyson Huntley, Richard Morris, Peter Tammes, Chris Salisbury, Sarah Purdy

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of the clinically oriented roles of a general practice receptionist: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What do patients and clinicians think about continuity in general practice in England? a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  10. Why do patients attend out-of-hours GP services in Ireland?Irish journal of medical science · 2025
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Clinical decision instruments for predicting mortality in patients with cirrhosis seeking emergency department care.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2025
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Review
  19. Health care utilization of patients with acute abdominal pain before and after emergency department visits.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  20. Factors affecting the experience of joined-up, continuous primary care in the absence of relational continuity: an observational study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fiona MacKichanSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5911-8172
Emer BranganSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Lesley WyeSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kath ChecklandCentre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Daniel LassersonNuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, England.
Alyson HuntleySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9409-7891
Richard MorrisSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Peter TammesSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Chris SalisburySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-3960
Sarah PurdySchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1111-26018Department of Health RP-DG-1213-10004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe how processes of primary care access influence decisions to seek help at the emergency department (ED).

designEthnographic case study combining non-participant observation, informal and formal interviewing.

settingSix general practitioner (GP) practices located in three commissioning organisations in England. PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsReception areas at each practice were observed over the course of a working week (73 hours in total). Practice documents were collected and clinical and non-clinical staff were interviewed (n=19). Patients with recent ED use, or a carer if aged 16 and under, were interviewed (n=29).

resultsPast experience of accessing GP care recursively informed patient decisions about where to seek urgent care, and difficulties with access were implicit in patient accounts of ED use. GP practices had complicated, changeable systems for appointments. This made navigating appointment booking difficult for patients and reception staff, and engendered a mistrust of the system. Increasingly, the telephone was the instrument of demand management, but there were unintended consequences for access. Some patient groups, such as those with English as an additional language, were particularly disadvantaged, and the varying patient and staff semantic of words like 'urgent' and 'emergency' was exacerbated during telephone interactions. Poor integration between in-hours and out-of-hours care and patient perceptions of the quality of care accessible at their GP practice also informed ED use.

conclusionsThis study provides important insight into the implicit role of primary care access on the use of ED. Discourses around 'inappropriate' patient demand neglect to recognise that decisions about where to seek urgent care are based on experiential knowledge. Simply speeding up access to primary care or increasing its volume is unlikely to alleviate rising ED use. Systems for accessing care need to be transparent, perceptibly fair and appropriate to the needs of diverse patient groups.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalAppointments and SchedulesGeneral PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityMedical ReceptionistsAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelCommunication BarriersEnglandFemaleHealth Services MisuseHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMiddle AgedACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINEHEALTH SERVICES ADMINISTRATION & MANAGEMENTOrganisation of health servicesPRIMARY CARE

Identifiers

PMID28473509
PMCPMC5623418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.