Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2017
Efficacy and safety of abatacept, a T-cell modulator, in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study in psoriatic arthritis.
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01860976 (A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Subcutaneous Injection in Adults With Active Psoriatic Arthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 111 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 3 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept Subcutaneous Injection in Adults With Active Psoriatic Arthritis
Who cites it
111 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 212 citations in OpenAlex.
- EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2023 update.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Guideline
- Abatacept and non-melanoma skin cancer in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comprehensive evaluation of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of therapies for psoriatic arthritis on patient-reported outcomes.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic review of the use of CRP in clinical trials for psoriatic arthritis: a concern for clinical practice?RMD open · 2022Pooled it
- The incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic and targeted synthetic agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Management of particular clinical situations in psoriatic arthritis: an expert's recommendation document based on systematic literature review and extended Delphi process.Rheumatology international · 2021Pooled it
- Does current evidence on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis reinforce an effect on radiographic progression? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Fourteen small molecule and biological agents for psoriatic arthritis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2020Guideline
- Efficacy and safety of biologics in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.RMD open · 2020Pooled it
- Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.Arthritis care & research · 2019Guideline
- Special Article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2019Guideline
- Trial
- Implementation of the OMERACT Psoriatic Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scoring System in a randomized phase IIb study of abatacept in psoriatic arthritis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022Trial
- Follicular helper T cell profiles predict response to costimulation blockade in type 1 diabetes.Nature immunology · 2020Trial
51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of abatacept, a selective T-cell costimulation modulator, in a phase III study in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).
methodsThis study randomised patients (1:1) with active PsA (~60% with prior exposure to a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor) to blinded weekly subcutaneous abatacept 125 mg (n=213) or placebo (n=211) for 24 weeks, followed by open-label subcutaneous abatacept. Patients without ≥20% improvement in joint counts at week 16 were switched to open-label abatacept. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with ≥20% improvement in the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) criteria at week 24.
resultsAbatacept significantly increased ACR20 response versus placebo at week 24 (39.4% vs 22.3%; p<0.001). Although abatacept numerically increased Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index response rates (reduction from baseline ≥0.35) at week 24, this was not statistically significant (31.0% vs 23.7%; p=0.097). The benefits of abatacept were seen in ACR20 responses regardless of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor exposure and in other musculoskeletal manifestations, but significance could not be attributed due to ranking below Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index response in hierarchical testing. However, the benefit on psoriasis lesions was modest. Efficacy was maintained or improved up to week 52. Abatacept was well tolerated with no new safety signals.
conclusionsAbatacept treatment of PsA in this phase III study achieved its primary end point, ACR20 response, showed beneficial trends overall in musculoskeletal manifestations and was well tolerated. There was only a modest impact on psoriasis lesions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01860976 (funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.