Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28473042›Full record

ReviewMayo Clinic proceedings2017

Monoclonal Gammopathy-Associated Peripheral Neuropathy: Diagnosis and Management.

Hafsa M Chaudhry, Michelle L Mauermann, S Vincent Rajkumar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mayo Clinic proceedings, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neurological manifestations of MGUS.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Smoldering Multiple Myeloma: Observation Versus Control Versus Cure.Hematology/oncology clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  20. Case Report: Application ofFrontiers in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hafsa M ChaudhryMayo Clinic School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Michelle L MauermannDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
S Vincent RajkumarDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. Electronic address: rajkumar.vincent@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Project 4: Targeting Resistance to T-Cell Directed Therapy in Multiple MyelomaP50CA186781 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Rafael Fonseca · 2015 to 2026
$25.5M
Prevalence and Progression of Monoclonal GammopathiesR01CA107476 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KUMAR, SHAJI KUNNATHU, RAJKUMAR, S VINCENT · 2004 to 2018
$4.6M
Onset and biomarkers for progression of monoclonal gammopathiesR01CA168762 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KUMAR, SHAJI KUNNATHU, RAJKUMAR, S VINCENT · 2012 to 2024
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA186781NCI NIH HHS R01 CA107476NCI NIH HHS R01 CA168762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal gammopathies comprise a spectrum of clonal plasma cell disorders that include monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, multiple myeloma, and Waldenström macroglobulinemia. In this review, we outline the epidemiology, etiology, classification, diagnosis, and treatment of monoclonal gammopathy-associated peripheral neuropathy. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is relatively common in the general population, with a prevalence of 3% to 4% among individuals older than age 50 years. Therefore, the presence of M protein in a patient with neuropathy does not automatically indicate a causal relationship. Monoclonal gammopathy-associated peripheral neuropathy is often a difficult diagnosis with limited treatment options. Studies addressing the optimal approach to diagnosis and management of this entity are limited. In addition to a review of the literature, we present a diagnostic approach to patients with monoclonal gammopathy-associated peripheral neuropathy and discuss available data and options for treatment.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousBiomarkersDemyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSDiagnosis, DifferentialGlycoproteinsHumansImmunoglobulinsImmunologic FactorsMonoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined SignificanceMyeloablative AgonistsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesPlasmapheresisPrognosisRituximabVidarabineBiomarkersfludarabineGlycoproteinsImmunoglobulinsImmunologic FactorsMyeloablative Agonistsprotein M (glycoprotein)RituximabVidarabine

Identifiers

PMID28473042
PMCPMC5573223
OpenAlexW2611398699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.