ArticleMicrobiome2017
Tracking microbial colonization in fecal microbiota transplantation experiments via genome-resolved metagenomics.
Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engrafting gut bacteriophages have potential to modulate microbial metabolism in fecal microbiota transplantation.Microbiome · 2025Pooled it
- Fecal microbiota transplantation promotes reduction of antimicrobial resistance by strain replacement.Science translational medicine · 2023Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Beyond the Gut: Unveiling Butyrate's Global Health Impact Through Gut Health and Dysbiosis-Related Conditions: A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Review
- The Importance of Microbiota and Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Pancreatic Disorders.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Limitation of amino acid availability by bacterial populations during enhanced colitis in IBD mouse model.mSystems · 2023Article
- Metabolic independence drives gut microbial colonization and resilience in health and disease.Genome biology · 2023Article
- Genetic Determinants of Escherichia coli Survival in Beach Sand.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Metaproteomics to understand how microbiota function: The crystal ball predicts a promising future.Environmental microbiology · 2023Article
- Article
- Dissecting the role of the human microbiome in COVID-19 via metagenome-assembled genomes.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Drivers and determinants of strain dynamics following fecal microbiota transplantation.Nature medicine · 2022Article
- Interspecies microbiome transplantation recapitulates microbial acquisition in mosquitoes.Microbiome · 2022Article
- Article
- The gut microbiome in human health and disease-Where are we and where are we going? A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Profiling a Community-Specific Function Landscape for Bacterial Peptides Through Protein-Level Meta-Assembly and Machine Learning.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective treatment for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection and shows promise for treating other medical conditions associated with intestinal dysbioses. However, we lack a sufficient understanding of which microbial populations successfully colonize the recipient gut, and the widely used approaches to study the microbial ecology of FMT experiments fail to provide enough resolution to identify populations that are likely responsible for FMT-derived benefits.
methodsWe used shotgun metagenomics together with assembly and binning strategies to reconstruct metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) from fecal samples of a single FMT donor. We then used metagenomic mapping to track the occurrence and distribution patterns of donor MAGs in two FMT recipients.
resultsOur analyses revealed that 22% of the 92 highly complete bacterial MAGs that we identified from the donor successfully colonized and remained abundant in two recipients for at least 8 weeks. Most MAGs with a high colonization rate belonged to the order Bacteroidales. The vast majority of those that lacked evidence of colonization belonged to the order Clostridiales, and colonization success was negatively correlated with the number of genes related to sporulation. Our analysis of 151 publicly available gut metagenomes showed that the donor MAGs that colonized both recipients were prevalent, and the ones that colonized neither were rare across the participants of the Human Microbiome Project. Although our dataset showed a link between taxonomy and the colonization ability of a given MAG, we also identified MAGs that belong to the same taxon with different colonization properties, highlighting the importance of an appropriate level of resolution to explore the functional basis of colonization and to identify targets for cultivation, hypothesis generation, and testing in model systems.
conclusionsThe analytical strategy adopted in our study can provide genomic insights into bacterial populations that may be critical to the efficacy of FMT due to their success in gut colonization and metabolic properties, and guide cultivation efforts to investigate mechanistic underpinnings of this procedure beyond associations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.