Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28472764›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

Comparative analysis of diagnostic performance, feasibility and cost of different test-methods for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.

Salvatore Sciacchitano, Luca Lavra, Alessandra Ulivieri, Fiorenza Magi, Gian Paolo De Francesco, Carlo Bellotti, Leila B Salehi, Maria Trovato, Carlo Drago, Armando Bartolazzi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. BRAF Detection in FNAC Combined with Semi-QuantitativeDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Morphometric study in thyroid tumors.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. BRAFCancer medicine · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Salvatore SciacchitanoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Luca LavraLaboratory of Biomedical Research, Niccolò Cusano University Foundation, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Alessandra UlivieriLaboratory of Biomedical Research, Niccolò Cusano University Foundation, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Fiorenza MagiLaboratory of Biomedical Research, Niccolò Cusano University Foundation, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Gian Paolo De FrancescoDepartment of Oncological Science, Breast Unit, St Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Carlo BellottiOperative Unit Surgery of Thyroid and Parathyroid, Sapienza University of Rome, St Andrea Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Leila B SalehiLaboratory of Biomedical Research, Niccolò Cusano University Foundation, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Maria TrovatoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Pad D 2° piano-AOU Policlinico "G. Martino", 98125 Messina, Italy.
Carlo DragoDepartment of Economics, Niccolò Cusano University, 00166 Rome, Italy.
Armando BartolazziLaboratory of Surgical and Experimental Pathology, St Andrea University Hospital, 00189 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since it is impossible to recognize malignancy at fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in indeterminate thyroid nodules, surgery is recommended for all of them. However, cancer rate at final histology is <30%. Many different test-methods have been proposed to increase diagnostic accuracy in such lesions, including Galectin-3-ICC (GAL-3-ICC), BRAF mutation analysis (BRAF), Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) alone and GEC+BRAF, mutation/fusion (M/F) panel, alone, M/F panel+miRNA GEC, and M/F panel by next generation sequencing (NGS), FDG-PET/CT, MIBI-Scan and TSHR mRNA blood assay.We performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses to compare their features, feasibility, diagnostic performance and cost. GEC, GEC+BRAF, M/F panel+miRNA GEC and M/F panel by NGS were the best in ruling-out malignancy (sensitivity = 90%, 89%, 89% and 90% respectively). BRAF and M/F panel alone and by NGS were the best in ruling-in malignancy (specificity = 100%, 93% and 93%). The M/F by NGS showed the highest accuracy (92%) and BRAF the highest diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) (247). GAL-3-ICC performed well as rule-out (sensitivity = 83%) and rule-in test (specificity = 85%), with good accuracy (84%) and high DOR (27) and is one of the cheapest (113 USD) and easiest one to be performed in different clinical settings.In conclusion, the more accurate molecular-based test-methods are still expensive and restricted to few, highly specialized and centralized laboratories. GAL-3-ICC, although limited by some false negatives, represents the most suitable screening test-method to be applied on a large-scale basis in the diagnostic algorithm of indeterminate thyroid lesions.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCytodiagnosisMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesAlgorithmsCost-Benefit AnalysisDisease ManagementHumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleBiomarkers, Tumordiagnostic performanceindeterminate thyroid nodulesmeta-analysissystematic reviewthyroid FNA cytology

Identifiers

PMID28472764
PMCPMC5564779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.