Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28472433›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Exploring spatially adjacent TFBS-clustered regions with Hi-C data.

Hebing Chen, Shuai Jiang, Zhuo Zhang, Hao Li, Yiming Lu, Xiaochen Bo

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hebing ChenBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 100850, China.
Shuai JiangBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 100850, China.
Zhuo ZhangBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 100850, China.
Hao LiBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 100850, China.
Yiming LuBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 100850, China.
Xiaochen BoBeijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing 100850, China.
Beijing Radiation Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationTranscription factor binding sites (TFBSs) are clustered in the human genome, forming the TFBS-clustered regions that regulate gene transcription, which requires dynamic chromatin configurations between promoters and distal regulatory elements. Here, we propose a regulatory model called spatially adjacent TFBS-clustered regions (SATs), in which TFBS-clustered regions are connected by spatial proximity as identified by high-resolution Hi-C data.

resultsTFBS-clustered regions forming SATs appeared less frequently in gene promoters than did isolated TFBS-clustered regions, whereas SATs as a whole appeared more frequently. These observations indicate that multiple distal TFBS-clustered regions combined to form SATs to regulate genes. Further examination confirmed that a substantial portion of genes regulated by SATs were located between the paired TFBS-clustered regions instead of the downstream. We reconstructed the chromosomal conformation of the H1 human embryonic stem cell line using the ShRec3D algorithm and proposed the SAT regulatory model. CONTACT: ylu.phd@gmail.com or boxc@bmi.ac.cn. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome, HumanPromoter Regions, GeneticSoftwareAlgorithmsBinding SitesCell LineDNAEmbryonic Stem CellsGenomicsHumansModels, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDNATranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID28472433
PMCPMC5860062
OpenAlexW2611390736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.