Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28472366›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2017

Androgen receptor gene status in plasma DNA associates with worse outcome on enzalutamide or abiraterone for castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multi-institution correlative biomarker study.

V Conteduca, D Wetterskog, M T A Sharabiani, E Grande, M P Fernandez-Perez, A Jayaram, S Salvi, D Castellano, A Romanel, C Lolli and 25 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02288936 (Phase II Multicenter Study to Analyze the Predictive Value of Fusion Gene TMPRSS2-ETS in Response to Enzalutamide in Patients With Metastatic CRPC no Previously Treated With Chemotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 148 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
148citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
26.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02288936 phase2completednot on this map

Phase II Multicenter Study to Analyze the Predictive Value of Fusion Gene TMPRSS2-ETS in Response to Enzalutamide in Patients With Metastatic CRPC no Previously Treated With Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpanish Oncology Genito-Urinary GroupRan2015 to 2019Enrolled98ConditionsHormone-refractory Prostate CancerArmsEnzalutamide
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

148 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 265 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer following docetaxel failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Circulating and Intratumoral Adrenal Androgens Correlate with Response to Abiraterone in Men with Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  10. Phase II Multicenter Study of Enzalutamide in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer to Identify Mechanisms Driving Resistance.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Expression of AR-V7 and ARvClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  13. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

88 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors at 20 institutions in 4 countries.

V ConteducaCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
D WetterskogCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
M T A SharabianiResearch Data Management and Statistics Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
E GrandeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid.
M P Fernandez-PerezDepartment of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Universidad de Murcia, Murcia.
A JayaramCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
S SalviDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
D CastellanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
A RomanelCentre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
C LolliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
V CasadioDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
G GurioliDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
D AmadoriDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
A FontOncology Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona.
S Vazquez-EstevezDepartment of Medical Oncology, H. Universitario Lucus Augusti, Lugo.
A González Del AlbaDepartment of Medical Oncology, H.U. Son Espases Mallorca, Mallorca.
B MelladoDepartment of Medical Oncology, IDIBAPS Hospital Clinic, Barcelona.
O Fernandez-CalvoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Orense, Orense.
M J Méndez-VidalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía, Córdoba.
M A ClimentDepartment of Medical Oncology, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología Valencia, Valencia.
I DuranDepartment of Medical Oncology, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, IBiS/Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/CSIC/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla.
E GallardoDepartment of Medical Oncology, H.U. Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Barcelona.
A RodriguezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital de León, León.
C SantanderDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Zaragoza.
M I SáezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Regional y Hospital Virgen de la Victoria, Malaga.
J PuenteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
D Gasi TandefeltCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
A WingateCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
D DearnaleyAcademic Urology Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
PREMIERE Collaborators
Spanish Oncology Genitourinary Group
F DemichelisCentre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
U De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy.
E Gonzalez-BillalabeitiaDepartment of Hematology & Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Morales Meseguer, IMIB-Universidad de Murcia, Murcia.
G AttardCentre for Evolution and Cancer, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITHospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer · ESIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBCorporació Sanitària Parc Taulí · ESFundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria · ESHospital de León · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario Lucus Augusti · ESHospital Universitario Miguel Servet · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESHospital Universitario Son Espases · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESInstituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla · ESMedical Center Hospital · US

Funding

Cancer Research UK 12518Cancer Research UK 22744Cancer Research UK A13239Prostate Cancer UK PG12-49
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is an urgent need to identify biomarkers to guide personalized therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We aimed to clinically qualify androgen receptor (AR) gene status measurement in plasma DNA using multiplex droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in pre- and post-chemotherapy CRPC.

methodsWe optimized ddPCR assays for AR copy number and mutations and retrospectively analyzed plasma DNA from patients recruited to one of the three biomarker protocols with prospectively collected clinical data. We evaluated associations between plasma AR and overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in 73 chemotherapy-naïve and 98 post-docetaxel CRPC patients treated with enzalutamide or abiraterone (Primary cohort) and 94 chemotherapy-naïve patients treated with enzalutamide (Secondary cohort; PREMIERE trial).

resultsIn the primary cohort, AR gain was observed in 10 (14%) chemotherapy-naïve and 33 (34%) post-docetaxel patients and associated with worse OS [hazard ratio (HR), 3.98; 95% CI 1.74-9.10; P < 0.001 and HR 3.81; 95% CI 2.28-6.37; P < 0.001, respectively], PFS (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.08-4.39; P = 0.03, and HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.23-3.11; P = 0.01, respectively) and rate of PSA decline ≥50% [odds ratio (OR), 4.7; 95% CI 1.17-19.17; P = 0.035 and OR, 5.0; 95% CI 1.70-14.91; P = 0.003, respectively]. AR mutations [2105T>A (p.L702H) and 2632A>G (p.T878A)] were observed in eight (11%) post-docetaxel but no chemotherapy-naïve abiraterone-treated patients and were also associated with worse OS (HR 3.26; 95% CI 1.47-not reached; P = 0.004). There was no interaction between AR and docetaxel status (P = 0.83 for OS, P = 0.99 for PFS). In the PREMIERE trial, 11 patients (12%) with AR gain had worse PSA-PFS (sPFS) (HR 4.33; 95% CI 1.94-9.68; P < 0.001), radiographic-PFS (rPFS) (HR 8.06; 95% CI 3.26-19.93; P < 0.001) and OS (HR 11.08; 95% CI 2.16-56.95; P = 0.004). Plasma AR was an independent predictor of outcome on multivariable analyses in both cohorts.

conclusionPlasma AR status assessment using ddPCR identifies CRPC with worse outcome to enzalutamide or abiraterone. Prospective evaluation of treatment decisions based on plasma AR is now required. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02288936 (PREMIERE trial).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAndrostenesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDNA Mutational AnalysisEuropeHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedabirateroneAndrostenesAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAR protein, humanBenzamidesBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAenzalutamideNitrilesPhenylthiohydantoinReceptors, Androgenabirateroneandrogen receptorbiomarkercastration-resistant prostate cancerenzalutamideplasma DNA

Identifiers

PMID28472366
PMCPMC5834043
OpenAlexW2611922828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.