Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28472232›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Differential privacy-based evaporative cooling feature selection and classification with relief-F and random forests.

Trang T Le, W Kyle Simmons, Masaya Misaki, Jerzy Bodurka, Bill C White, Jonathan Savitz, Brett A McKinney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Differential privacy in health research: A scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Consensus features nested cross-validation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. AgeGuess, a Methylomic Prediction Model for Human Ages.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. STatistical Inference Relief (STIR) feature selection.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Trang T LeDepartment of Mathematics, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.
W Kyle SimmonsLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA.
Masaya MisakiLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA.
Jerzy BodurkaLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA.
Bill C WhiteTandy School of Computer Science, University of Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.
Jonathan SavitzLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK 74136, USA.
Brett A McKinneyDepartment of Mathematics, University of Tulsa, Tulsa, OK 74104, USA.

Funding

Inflammatory Transcripts, Genes and Positive Valence System Function in AnhedoniaR01MH098099 · NIMH · LAUREATE INSTITUTE FOR BRAIN RESEARCH · PI BODURKA, JERZY ALEKSANDER · 2012 to 2015
$2.5M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationClassification of individuals into disease or clinical categories from high-dimensional biological data with low prediction error is an important challenge of statistical learning in bioinformatics. Feature selection can improve classification accuracy but must be incorporated carefully into cross-validation to avoid overfitting. Recently, feature selection methods based on differential privacy, such as differentially private random forests and reusable holdout sets, have been proposed. However, for domains such as bioinformatics, where the number of features is much larger than the number of observations p≫n , these differential privacy methods are susceptible to overfitting.

methodsWe introduce private Evaporative Cooling, a stochastic privacy-preserving machine learning algorithm that uses Relief-F for feature selection and random forest for privacy preserving classification that also prevents overfitting. We relate the privacy-preserving threshold mechanism to a thermodynamic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, where the temperature represents the privacy threshold. We use the thermal statistical physics concept of Evaporative Cooling of atomic gases to perform backward stepwise privacy-preserving feature selection.

resultsOn simulated data with main effects and statistical interactions, we compare accuracies on holdout and validation sets for three privacy-preserving methods: the reusable holdout, reusable holdout with random forest, and private Evaporative Cooling, which uses Relief-F feature selection and random forest classification. In simulations where interactions exist between attributes, private Evaporative Cooling provides higher classification accuracy without overfitting based on an independent validation set. In simulations without interactions, thresholdout with random forest and private Evaporative Cooling give comparable accuracies. We also apply these privacy methods to human brain resting-state fMRI data from a study of major depressive disorder. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code available at http://insilico.utulsa.edu/software/privateEC . CONTACT: brett-mckinney@utulsa.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Machine LearningModels, BiologicalPrivacyClassificationComputational BiologyHumansMajor Depressive DisorderSoftware

Identifiers

PMID28472232
PMCPMC5870708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.