ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
Differential privacy-based evaporative cooling feature selection and classification with relief-F and random forests.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of the joint clustering algorithm based on Gaussian kernels and differential privacy in lung cancer identification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Disulfidptosis-related genes serve as potential prognostic biomarkers and indicate tumor microenvironment characteristics and immunotherapy response in prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prediction and optimization method for welding quality of components in ship construction.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Novel HLA associations with outcomes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis exposure and sarcoidosis in individuals of African ancestry using nearest-neighbor feature selection.Genetic epidemiology · 2022Article
- Differential privacy in health research: A scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Theoretical properties of distance distributions and novel metrics for nearest-neighbor feature selection.PloS one · 2021Article
- Nearest-neighbor Projected-Distance Regression (NPDR) for detecting network interactions with adjustments for multiple tests and confounding.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Consensus features nested cross-validation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Random-forest algorithm based biomarkers in predicting prognosis in the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer cell international · 2020Article
- AgeGuess, a Methylomic Prediction Model for Human Ages.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
- EpistasisRank and EpistasisKatz: interaction network centrality methods that integrate prior knowledge networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- STatistical Inference Relief (STIR) feature selection.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Multi-Level Model to Predict Antibody Response to Influenza Vaccine Using Gene Expression Interaction Network Feature Selection.Microorganisms · 2019Article
- The role of systems biology approaches in determining molecular signatures for the development of more effective vaccines.Expert review of vaccines · 2019Review
- Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2018Review
- Multivariate Optimization of k for k-Nearest-Neighbor Feature Selection With Dichotomous Outcomes: Complex Associations, Class Imbalance, and Application to RNA-Seq in Major Depressive Disorder.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationClassification of individuals into disease or clinical categories from high-dimensional biological data with low prediction error is an important challenge of statistical learning in bioinformatics. Feature selection can improve classification accuracy but must be incorporated carefully into cross-validation to avoid overfitting. Recently, feature selection methods based on differential privacy, such as differentially private random forests and reusable holdout sets, have been proposed. However, for domains such as bioinformatics, where the number of features is much larger than the number of observations p≫n , these differential privacy methods are susceptible to overfitting.
methodsWe introduce private Evaporative Cooling, a stochastic privacy-preserving machine learning algorithm that uses Relief-F for feature selection and random forest for privacy preserving classification that also prevents overfitting. We relate the privacy-preserving threshold mechanism to a thermodynamic Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, where the temperature represents the privacy threshold. We use the thermal statistical physics concept of Evaporative Cooling of atomic gases to perform backward stepwise privacy-preserving feature selection.
resultsOn simulated data with main effects and statistical interactions, we compare accuracies on holdout and validation sets for three privacy-preserving methods: the reusable holdout, reusable holdout with random forest, and private Evaporative Cooling, which uses Relief-F feature selection and random forest classification. In simulations where interactions exist between attributes, private Evaporative Cooling provides higher classification accuracy without overfitting based on an independent validation set. In simulations without interactions, thresholdout with random forest and private Evaporative Cooling give comparable accuracies. We also apply these privacy methods to human brain resting-state fMRI data from a study of major depressive disorder. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code available at http://insilico.utulsa.edu/software/privateEC . CONTACT: brett-mckinney@utulsa.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.