ArticlePLoS computational biology2017
Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten simple rules for suggesting reviewers during a paper submission.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- The promise of community-driven preprints in ecology and evolution.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
- Open science practices in traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine research: A path to enhanced transparency and collaboration.Integrative medicine research · 2024Article
- Get Free Copy: a multi-repository search platform for biomedical publications.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Article
- Perspectives on scientific error.Royal Society open science · 2023Review
- The rise of preprints in earth sciences.F1000Research · 2023Article
- The use and acceptability of preprints in health and social care settings: A scoping review.PloS one · 2023Article
- Why don't we share data and code? Perceived barriers and benefits to public archiving practices.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Artificial Intelligence for Radiation Oncology Applications Using Public Datasets.Seminars in radiation oncology · 2022Review
- Ten simple rules for getting and giving credit for data.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- A guide to preprinting for early-career researchers.Biology open · 2022Article
- Seven steps to enhance Open Science practices in animal science.PNAS nexus · 2022Article
- Writing up your clinical trial report for a scientific journal: the REPORT trial guide for effective and transparent research reporting without spin.British journal of sports medicine · 2022Review
- Estimating the Prevalence of Transparency and Reproducibility-Related Research Practices in Psychology (2014-2017).Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for researchers who want to develop web apps.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- COVID-19 impact on research and publication ethics.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2021Article
- Open Science for Veterinary Education Research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences.PLoS genetics · 2020Review
- Increasing the accessibility and impact of justice-related student and practitioner research.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2020Article
- Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article.eLife · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.