Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28472038›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

Auditory motion-specific mechanisms in the primate brain.

Colline Poirier, Simon Baumann, Pradeep Dheerendra, Olivier Joly, David Hunter, Fabien Balezeau, Li Sun, Adrian Rees, Christopher I Petkov, Alexander Thiele and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Do you hear what I see? How do early blind individuals experience object motion?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Representation of Time Windows in Primate Auditory Cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Direct Structural Connections between Auditory and Visual Motion-Selective Regions in Humans.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Interindividual Variability of Functional Connectivity in Awake and Anesthetized Rhesus Macaque Monkeys.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2019
    Article
  14. Representation of Auditory Motion Directions and Sound Source Locations in the Human Planum Temporale.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Colline PoirierInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9793-4907
Simon BaumannInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Pradeep DheerendraInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Olivier JolyInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
David HunterInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Fabien BalezeauInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Li SunInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Adrian ReesInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Christopher I PetkovInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Alexander ThieleInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.
Timothy D GriffithsInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J009849/1National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/K000608/1Wellcome Trust 102961/Z/13/ZWellcome Trust WT085002MAWellcome Trust WT091681MAWellcome Trust WT092606AIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This work examined the mechanisms underlying auditory motion processing in the auditory cortex of awake monkeys using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We tested to what extent auditory motion analysis can be explained by the linear combination of static spatial mechanisms, spectrotemporal processes, and their interaction. We found that the posterior auditory cortex, including A1 and the surrounding caudal belt and parabelt, is involved in auditory motion analysis. Static spatial and spectrotemporal processes were able to fully explain motion-induced activation in most parts of the auditory cortex, including A1, but not in circumscribed regions of the posterior belt and parabelt cortex. We show that in these regions motion-specific processes contribute to the activation, providing the first demonstration that auditory motion is not simply deduced from changes in static spatial location. These results demonstrate that parallel mechanisms for motion and static spatial analysis coexist within the auditory dorsal stream.

Indexed as

AnimalsAuditory CortexMacaca mulattaMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMotion PerceptionSound Localization

Identifiers

PMID28472038
PMCPMC5417421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.