ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2017
Identifying "ownership" through role descriptions to support implementing universal colorectal cancer tumor screening for Lynch syndrome.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of COVID-19 on Universal Tumor Screening, Referral Rates and Attendance at Cancer Genetic Counseling at a Safety-Net University Hospital.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Predictive factors based on the health belief model on cancer screening behaviour in first degree relatives of patients with Lynch syndrome-associated colorectal cancer.International journal of nursing sciences · 2023Article
- Stakeholders' views of integrating universal tumour screening and genetic testing for colorectal and endometrial cancer into routine oncology.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2021Article
- Organizational readiness to implement population-based screening and genetic service delivery for hereditary cancer prevention and control.Journal of genetic counseling · 2020Article
- How can Australia integrate routine genetic sequencing in oncology: a qualitative study through an implementation science lens.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020Article
- Disparities in gynecologic cancer genetics evaluation.Gynecologic oncology · 2019Review
- Information exchange between patients with Lynch syndrome and their genetic and non-genetic health professionals: whose responsibility?Journal of community genetics · 2019Article
- Disseminating universal genetic testing to a diverse, indigent patient population at a county hospital gynecologic oncology clinic.Gynecologic oncology · 2019Article
- Clinician-Stakeholders' Perspectives on Using Patient Portals to Return Lynch Syndrome Screening Results.Journal of genetic counseling · 2018Article
- Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Implementation of Genetic Services: A Public Health Perspective.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
- A Systematic Review on the Existing Screening Pathways for Lynch Syndrome Identification.Frontiers in public health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PurposeLynch syndrome cases are underidentified, and universal colorectal cancer tumor screening for Lynch syndrome (UTS) has been recommended. UTS implementation is challenging and few successful examples exist to date, and colorectal cancer patients and at-risk family members exhibit low uptake of genetic services. This study sought to identify the elements that could guide the choice of specialties to implement UTS through three main stages: initiating the screen, returning positive screen results, and providing follow-up.MethodsTo understand stakeholder views on the UTS process, 20 semistructured interviews were conducted with clinicians from six medical specialties crucial for implementing UTS. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis and additional thematic analysis across content categories.ResultsSeveral clinical specialties could fill necessary roles at each of the main stages of UTS implementation. Participants suggested owners based on attributes of specialty roles, clinical settings, and the routes patients take through the system.ConclusionUTS is considered possible in a range of health-care settings, with tailoring. Health systems need to choose who best fills the role's needs based on local resources and processes. These results offer implementation guidance based on role needs, not clinical specialty, in resolving the issue of UTS "ownership."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.