ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Unsupervised Machine Learning for Developing Personalised Behaviour Models Using Activity Data.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health Monitoring Using Smart Home Technologies: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- Modeling inter-individual differences in ambulatory-based multimodal signals via metric learning: a case study of personalized well-being estimation of healthcare workers.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Machine Learning Derived Lifting Techniques and Pain Self-Efficacy in People with Chronic Low Back Pain.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Indoor Location Data for Tracking Human Behaviours: A Scoping Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Motion Sensor-Based Detection of Outlier Days Supporting Continuous Health Assessment for Single Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Correction: Fiorini, L., et al., Unsupervised Machine Learning for Developing Personalised Behaviour Models Using Activity Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Tree Alignment Based on Needleman-Wunsch Algorithm for Sensor Selection in Smart Homes.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The goal of this study is to address two major issues that undermine the large scale deployment of smart home sensing solutions in people's homes. These include the costs associated with having to install and maintain a large number of sensors, and the pragmatics of annotating numerous sensor data streams for activity classification. Our aim was therefore to propose a method to describe individual users' behavioural patterns starting from unannotated data analysis of a minimal number of sensors and a "blind" approach for activity recognition. The methodology included processing and analysing sensor data from 17 older adults living in community-based housing to extract activity information at different times of the day. The findings illustrate that 55 days of sensor data from a sensor configuration comprising three sensors, and extracting appropriate features including a "busyness" measure, are adequate to build robust models which can be used for clustering individuals based on their behaviour patterns with a high degree of accuracy (>85%). The obtained clusters can be used to describe individual behaviour over different times of the day. This approach suggests a scalable solution to support optimising the personalisation of care by utilising low-cost sensing and analysis. This approach could be used to track a person's needs over time and fine-tune their care plan on an ongoing basis in a cost-effective manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.