Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28470506›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2017

Navigating cancer using online communities: a grounded theory of survivor and family experiences.

Lydia Jo Harkin, Kinta Beaver, Paola Dey, Kartina Choong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Beyond one-size-fits-all: mapping information-seeking and decision-making pathways in cancer care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. "We are champions": an investigation on how cancer support group propels patient advocacy, voices, education, mentorship, and support.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The experiences of family members of deceased organ donors and suggestions to improve the donation process: a qualitative study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Article
  14. Transitional self-disappear: the journey of cancer survivors to self re-coherence in a Middle East society.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. External support factors utilized by patients in coping with cancer: a European perspective.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Risk reduction and harm prevention in technology use. •.Journal of behavioral addictions · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lydia Jo HarkinDivision of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG4 1BU, UK. lydia.harkin02@ntu.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0511-5934
Kinta BeaverSchool of Health Sciences, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK.
Paola DeyFaculty of Health and Social Care, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, Lancashire, L39 4QP, UK.
Kartina ChoongLancashire Law School, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeople affected by cancer often have unmet emotional and social support needs. Online cancer communities are a convenient channel for connecting cancer survivors, allowing them to support one another. However, it is unclear whether online community use makes a meaningful contribution to cancer survivorship, as little previous research has examined the experience of using contemporary cancer communities. We aimed to explore the experiences of visitors to online cancer communities.

methodsTwenty-three in-depth interviews were conducted with online cancer community visitors, including cancer survivors (n = 18), family members (n = 2), and individuals who were both a survivor and family member (n = 3). Interviews were analysed using a grounded theory approach.

resultsA theory developed explaining how individuals 'navigated' the experience of cancer using online cancer communities. Online advice and information led participants on a 'journey to become informed'. Online friendships normalised survivorship and cast participants on a 'journey to recreate identity'. Participants navigated a 'journey through different worlds' as they discovered relevant and hidden communities.

conclusionsThis theory highlights virtual paths people affected by cancer can take to self-manage their experience of the disease. Online community experiences can be improved by promoting online evaluation skills and signposting visitors to bereavement support. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivors can benefit through both lurking and posting in online communities. However, individuals risk becoming distressed when they befriend individuals who may soon die. Additionally, people affected by rarer cancers can struggle to find shared experiences online and may need to look elsewhere for support.

Indexed as

Grounded TheorySocial SupportAdultAgedCancer SurvivorsEducation, DistanceFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchCancerGrounded theoryOnline supportQualitative researchSocial mediaSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID28470506
PMCPMC5671555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.