Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28470368›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2017

Breast cancer survivors' preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions.

Siobhan M Phillips, David E Conroy, Sarah Kozey Keadle, Christine A Pellegrini, Gillian R Lloyd, Frank J Penedo, Bonnie Spring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effectiveness of eHealth interventions in long-term follow-up care for breast and gynecological cancer survivors: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Physical activity programming and counseling preferences among cancer survivors: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Effects of a Physical Activity mHealth Intervention (Fit2Thrive) on WCRF/AICR Cancer Prevention Recommendations among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Secondary Data Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Effect of the Fit2Thrive Intervention on Patient-reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Full Factorial Trial.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Self-monitoring physical activity with a smartphone application in cancer patients: a randomized feasibility study (SMART-trial).Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2018
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Cancer survivors' interests and preferences for muscle-strengthening activity interventions.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siobhan M PhillipsDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA. smphillips@northwestern.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8899-3825
David E ConroyDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Sarah Kozey KeadleKinesiology Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA.
Christine A PellegriniDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Gillian R LloydDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Frank J PenedoDepartments of Medical Social Sciences and Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bonnie SpringDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 680 N. Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Funding

Multidisciplinary Clinical and Translational Science (MCTS) Program (UL1)UL1TR000150 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI LLOYD-JONES, DONALD M · 2012 to 2013
$10.1M
Designing with Dissemination in Mind: Optimization of a mHealth Physical Activity Intervention for Breast Cancer SurvivorsK07CA196840 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PHILLIPS, SIOBHAN MARIE · 2015 to 2019
$729k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000150NCI NIH HHS K07 CA196840NCI NIH HHS K07CA196840NIH HHS UL1TR000150
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to explore breast cancer survivors' interest in and preferences for technology-supported exercise interventions.

methodsPost-treatment survivors [n = 279; M

resultsAbout half (53.4%) of survivors self-reported meeting public health recommendations for physical activity. Fewer than half reported using an exercise or diet mobile app (41.2%) or owning an activity tracker (40.5%). The majority were interested in receiving remotely delivered exercise counseling (84.6%), participating in a remotely delivered exercise intervention (79.5%), and using an exercise app or website (68%). Survivors reported that the most helpful technology-supported intervention components would be an activity tracker (89.5%), personalized feedback (81.2%), and feedback on how exercise is influencing mood, fatigue, etc. (73.6%). Components rated as least helpful were social networking integration (31.2%), group competitions (33.9%), and ability to see others' progress (35.1%).

conclusionsPreferences for technology-supported exercise interventions varied among breast cancer survivors. Nonetheless, data indicate that technology-supported interventions may be feasible and acceptable. Engaging stakeholders may be important in developing and testing potential intervention components.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsInventionsPatient PreferenceAdultAgedCounselingDietExerciseExercise TherapyFatigueFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMobile ApplicationsSelf ReportBreast cancer survivorsInterventionsPhysical activityPhysical exerciseTechnology

Identifiers

PMID28470368
PMCPMC5832636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.