Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28469843›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science and biotechnology2017

Review: Utilization of yeast of

Gibson M Alugongo, Jianxin Xiao, Zhaohai Wu, Shengli Li, Yajing Wang, Zhijun Cao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science and biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of Combining a Prebiotic (Autolyzed Yeast fromAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Application ofIranian journal of microbiology · 2025
    Review
  4. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Investigation of the impact of multi-strain probiotics containingJournal of animal science and technology · 2024
    Review
  10. Feeding aAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Supplementation of Foals with aAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Research Progress of Biological Feed in Beef Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Gibson M AlugongoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jianxin XiaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhaohai WuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Shengli LiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yajing WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhijun CaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Yeast of

Indexed as

Active live yeastCalvesHealthYeast culture

Identifiers

PMID28469843
PMCPMC5410697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.