ArticleBMC nursing2017
Describing the implementation of an innovative intervention and evaluating its effectiveness in increasing research capacity of advanced clinical nurses: using the consolidated framework for implementation research.
Article in BMC nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis exploring the impacts of clinical academic activity by healthcare professionals outside medicine.BMC health services research · 2021Pooled it
- The effects of care bundles on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Implementation science : IS · 2017Pooled it
- Facilitators and barriers to innovation and research capacity among clinical nurses: A qualitative systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Strengthening Clinical Nurses' Research Capacity: A Scoping Review of Factors That Influence Nurses' Engagement in Clinical Research.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Nurses' Opinions About Clinical Nursing Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Observational
- Perceptions and characteristics of the mentor role in research capacity building programs for clinicians: a scoping review and thematic analysis.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Understanding the clinical nurses' perceptions and coping strategies of nursing research: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Clinical nurses' perceptions of research in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- The current status and influence factors of research ability among community nurses: A sequential qualitative-quantitative study.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2025Article
- Influential factors associated with core competencies of diabetes specialist nurses and correlation with self-directed learning ability: A cross-sectional study.Nursing open · 2024Article
- Article
- "It's a proactive intervention instead of a reactive one": measuring facilitators and barriers regarding readiness to implement a treatment program for infants with neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Describing the evidence-base for research engagement by health care providers and health care organisations: a scoping review.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Participation of nurses and allied health professionals in research activities: a survey in an academic tertiary pediatric hospital.BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Building research capacity and culture: Exploring nurses' experience of implementing a nurse-led clinical trial.Journal of nursing management · 2022Article
- Research capacity-building for clinicians: understanding how the research facilitator role fosters clinicians' engagement in the research process.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Development of a blended emergent research training program for clinical nurses (part 1).BMC nursing · 2022Article
- Research ability and research motivation of postgraduate nursing students in traditional Chinese medicine colleges.Nursing open · 2022Article
- Factors Associated with Research knowledge and Attitude among Clinical Midwives Working at Public Health Facilities of Northwest Ethiopia, 2021: A Cross-Sectional Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2022Article
- Midwifery-led researches for evidence-based practice: Clinical midwives engagement in research in Ethiopia, 2021.PloS one · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite advanced nursing roles having a research competency, participation in research is low. There are many barriers to participation in research and few interventions have been developed to address these. This paper aims to describe the implementation of an intervention to increase research participation in advanced clinical nursing roles and evaluate its effectiveness.
methodsThe implementation of the intervention was carried out within one hospital site. The evaluation utilised a mixed methods design and a implementation science framework. All staff in advanced nursing roles were invited to take part, all those who were interested and had a project in mind could volunteer to participate in the intervention. The intervention consisted of the development of small research groups working on projects developed by the nurse participant/s and supported by an academic and a research fellow. The main evaluation was through focus groups. Output was analysed using thematic analysis. In addition, a survey questionnaire was circulated to all participants to ascertain their self-reported research skills before and after the intervention. The results of the survey were analysed using descriptive statistics. Finally an inventory of research outputs was collated.
resultsIn the first year, twelve new clinical nurse-led research projects were conducted and reported in six peer reviewed papers, two non-peer reviewed papers and 20 conference presentations. The main strengths of the intervention were its promptness to complete research, to publish and to showcase clinical innovations. Main barriers identified were time, appropriate support from academics and from peers. The majority of participants had increased experience at scientific writing and data analysis.
conclusionThis study shows that an intervention, with minor financial resources; a top down approach; support of a hands on research fellow; peer collaboration with academics; strong clinical ownership by the clinical nurse researcher; experiential learning opportunities; focused and with needs based educational sessions, is an intervention that can both increase research outputs and capacity of clinically based nurses. Interventions to further enhance nursing research and their evaluation are crucial if we are to address the deficit of nurse-led patient-centred research in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.