Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28469427›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse : research and treatment2017

Vaping Synthetic Cannabinoids: A Novel Preclinical Model of E-Cigarette Use in Mice.

Timothy W Lefever, Julie A Marusich, Brian F Thomas, Daniel G Barrus, Nicholas C Peiper, Richard C Kevin, Jenny L Wiley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse : research and treatment, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Cardiac effects of 5F-Cumyl-PEGACLONE.International journal of legal medicine · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. An Update on the Implications of New Psychoactive Substances in Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  5. The chemistry and toxicology of vaping.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Explication of CBDrug and alcohol dependence · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. New psychoactive substances: a review and updates.Therapeutic advances in psychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy W LefeverCenter for Drug Discovery, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Julie A MarusichCenter for Drug Discovery, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Brian F ThomasAnalytical Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel G BarrusCenter for Drug Discovery, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Nicholas C PeiperBehavioral and Urban Health Program, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Richard C KevinAnalytical Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.
Jenny L WileyCenter for Drug Discovery, RTI International, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

THC RECEPTORSR01DA003672 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI WILEY, JENNY L. · 1985 to 2018
$4.9M
Investigation of Synthetic Cannabinoid Exposures and Pharmacological ConsequencesR01DA040460 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI RANGAN MAITRA, Yanan Zhang · 2016 to 2026
$4.5M
THC RECEPTORSR37DA003672 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI MARTIN, BILLY R · 1997 to 2006
$2.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA003672NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040460NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA003672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoking is the most common route of administration for cannabis; however, vaping cannabis extracts and synthetic cannabinoids ("fake marijuana") in electronic cigarette devices has become increasingly popular. Yet, most animal models used to investigate biological mechanisms underlying cannabis use employ injection as the route of administration. This study evaluated a novel e-cigarette device that delivers aerosolized cannabinoids to mice. The effects of aerosolized and injected synthetic cannabinoids (CP 55,940, AB-CHMINACA, XLR-11, and JWH-018) in mice were compared in a battery of bioassays in which psychoactive cannabinoids produce characteristic effects. The most potent cannabinoids (CP 55,940 and AB-CHMINACA) produced the full cannabinoid profile (ie, hypothermia, hypolocomotion, and analgesia), regardless of the route of administration. In contrast, aerosolized JWH-018 and XLR-11 did not produce the full profile of cannabimimetic effects. Results of time course analysis for hypothermia showed that aerosol exposure to CP 55,940 and AB-CHMINACA produced faster onset of effects and shorter duration of action than injection. The ability to administer cannabinoids to rodents using the most common route of administration among humans provides a method for collecting preclinical data with enhanced translational relevance.

Indexed as

Animal modelse-cigarettessynthetic cannabinoidsvaping

Identifiers

PMID28469427
PMCPMC5398321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.