ArticleEvolutionary bioinformatics online2017
Performance of Hidden Markov Models in Recovering the Standard Classification of Glycoside Hydrolases.
Article in Evolutionary bioinformatics online, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Insights into putative alginate lyases from epipelagic and mesopelagic communities of the global ocean.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Altered rumen microbiome and correlations of the metabolome in heat-stressed dairy cows at different growth stages.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Glycoside hydrolases (GHs) are carbohydrate-active enzymes that assist the hydrolysis of glycoside bonds of complex sugars into carbohydrates. The current standard GH family classification is available in the CAZy database, which is based on the similarities of amino acid sequences and curated semi-automatically. However, with the exponential increase in data availability from genome sequences, automated classification methods are required for the fast annotation of coding sequences. Currently, the dbCAN database offers automatic annotations of signature domains from CAZy-defined classifications using a statistical approach, the hidden Markov models (HMMs). However, dbCAN does not contain the entire set of CAZy GH families. Moreover, no evaluation has been conducted so far of the viability of using HMM profiles as a means of automatically assigning GH amino acid sequences to the standard CAZy GH family classification itself. In this work, we performed a meta-analysis in which amino acid sequences from CAZy-defined GH families were used to build HMM family-specific profiles. We then queried a set with ~300 000 GH sequences against our database of HMM profiles estimated from CAZy families. We conducted the same evaluation against the available dbCAN HMM profiles. Our analyses recovered 65% of matches with the standard CAZy classification, whereas dbCAN HMMs resulted in 61% of matches. We also provided an analysis of the types of errors commonly found when HMMs are used to recover CAZy-based classifications. Although the performance of HMM was good, further developments are necessary for a fully automated classification of GH, allowing the standardization of GH classification among protein databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.