Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28469259›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Multiplex detection of bacteria on an integrated centrifugal disk using bead-beating lysis and loop-mediated amplification.

He Yan, Yunzeng Zhu, Yan Zhang, Lei Wang, Junge Chen, Ying Lu, Youchun Xu, Wanli Xing

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Multiplex detection of six swine viruses on an integrated centrifugal disk using loop-mediated isothermal amplification.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

He YanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Yunzeng ZhuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Yan ZhangCollaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
Lei WangCollaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hangzhou, 310003, China.
Junge ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-884X
Ying LuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Youchun XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. xyc2012@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Wanli XingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. wlxing@tsinghua.edu.cn.
Tsinghua University · CNSouth China Institute of Collaborative Innovation · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although culture-based identification of bacteria is the gold-standard for the diagnosis of infectious diseases, it is time consuming. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics and microfluidic technologies have opened up new avenues for rapid detection of bacteria. Here, we describe a centrifugal-microfluidic chip for the detection of bacteria by integrating the cell lysis, clarification, and loop-mediated amplification (LAMP). The major advantages of this chip are as follows. Firstly, bacteria lysis was innovatively achieved by rotating a pair of magnets to generate bead-beating while the chip was kept stationary during lysis, which simplified the chip design because no additional valve was needed. Secondly, the on-chip assay time was short (within 70 min), which was competitive in emergency situations. Thirdly, results of the analysis can be interpreted by using a fluorescence detector or by the naked-eye, making it versatile in many areas, especially the resource-limited areas. The on-chip limits of detection of six types of bacteria were valued by gel electrophoresis, showing the similar results compared to the bench-top LAMP protocol. This chip can be used for rapid, sensitive, accurate and automated detection of bacteria, offering a promising alternative for simplifying the molecular diagnostics of infectious diseases.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesBacterial Typing TechniquesCentrifugationDNA, BacterialGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaLimit of DetectionNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID28469259
PMCPMC5431220
OpenAlexW2609354944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.