Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28469191›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Integrated single- and two-photon light sheet microscopy using accelerating beams.

Peeter Piksarv, Dominik Marti, Tuan Le, Angelika Unterhuber, Lindsey H Forbes, Melissa R Andrews, Andreas Stingl, Wolfgang Drexler, Peter E Andersen, Kishan Dholakia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Peeter PiksarvSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, UK.
Dominik MartiDepartment of Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1745-3116
Tuan LeFemtolasers Produktions GmbH, Fernkorngasse 10, 1100, Vienna, Austria.
Angelika UnterhuberCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Lindsey H ForbesSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.
Melissa R AndrewsSchool of Medicine, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9TF, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5960-5619
Andreas StinglFemtolasers Produktions GmbH, Fernkorngasse 10, 1100, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang DrexlerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Peter E AndersenDepartment of Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Frederiksborgvej 399, 4000, Roskilde, Denmark.
Kishan DholakiaSUPA, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of St Andrews, North Haugh, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, UK. kd1@st-andrews.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We demonstrate the first light sheet microscope using propagation invariant, accelerating Airy beams that operates both in single- and two-photon modes. The use of the Airy beam permits us to develop an ultra compact, high resolution light sheet system without beam scanning. In two-photon mode, an increase in the field of view over the use of a standard Gaussian beam by a factor of six is demonstrated. This implementation for light sheet microscopy opens up new possibilities across a wide range of biomedical applications, especially for the study of neuronal processes.

Identifiers

PMID28469191
PMCPMC5431168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.