ArticleNature communications2017
Subsampling scaling.
Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
44 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Critical neuronal avalanches arise from excitation-inhibition balanced spontaneous activity.iScience · 2026Article
- Hippocampal criticality tracks cognitive demand and shifts with memory impairment.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Power Laws in Empirical Eigenvalue Spectra.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Hierarchical whole-brain modeling of critical synchronization dynamics in the human brain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Inferring global exponents in subsampled neural systems.iScience · 2025Article
- Phase transitions inArXiv · 2025Article
- Nanoporous platinum microelectrode arrays for neuroscience applications.RSC advances · 2025Article
- The recovery of parabolic avalanches in spatially subsampled neuronal networks at criticality.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Existence of multiple transitions of the critical state due to anesthetics.Nature communications · 2024Article
- The recovery of parabolic avalanches in spatially subsampled neuronal networks at criticality.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Brain-state mediated modulation of inter-laminar dependencies in visual cortex.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Low-dimensional criticality embedded in high-dimensional awake brain dynamics.Science advances · 2024Article
- Mind In Vitro Platforms: Versatile, Scalable, Robust, and Open Solutions to Interfacing with Living Neurons.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Article
- Criticality and universality in neuronal cultures during "up" and "down" states.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2024Article
- Generating single-cell gene expression profiles for high-resolution spatial transcriptomics based on cell boundary images.GigaByte (Hong Kong, China) · 2024Article
- Criticality of neuronal avalanches in human sleep and their relationship with sleep macro- and micro-architecture.iScience · 2023Article
- Parabolic avalanche scaling in the synchronization of cortical cell assemblies.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Structural Modularity Tunes Mesoscale Criticality in Biological Neuronal Networks.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In real-world applications, observations are often constrained to a small fraction of a system. Such spatial subsampling can be caused by the inaccessibility or the sheer size of the system, and cannot be overcome by longer sampling. Spatial subsampling can strongly bias inferences about a system's aggregated properties. To overcome the bias, we derive analytically a subsampling scaling framework that is applicable to different observables, including distributions of neuronal avalanches, of number of people infected during an epidemic outbreak, and of node degrees. We demonstrate how to infer the correct distributions of the underlying full system, how to apply it to distinguish critical from subcritical systems, and how to disentangle subsampling and finite size effects. Lastly, we apply subsampling scaling to neuronal avalanche models and to recordings from developing neural networks. We show that only mature, but not young networks follow power-law scaling, indicating self-organization to criticality during development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.