ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2017
Regulation of axonal regeneration following spinal cord injury in the lamprey.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Animal Models of Spinal Cord Injury.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Neurons Are Not All the Same: Diversity in Neuronal Populations and Their Intrinsic Responses to Spinal Cord Injury.ASN neuro · 2025Review
- Spinal cord injury significantly alters the properties of reticulospinal neurons: delayed repolarization mediated by potassium channels.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following rostral spinal cord injury (SCI) in larval lampreys, injured descending brain neurons, particularly reticulospinal (RS) neurons, regenerate their axons, and locomotor behavior recovers in a few weeks. However, axonal regeneration of descending brain neurons is mostly limited to relatively short distances, but the mechanisms for incomplete axonal regeneration are unclear. First, lampreys with rostral SCI exhibited greater axonal regeneration of descending brain neurons, including RS neurons, as well as more rapid recovery of locomotor muscle activity right below the lesion site, compared with animals with caudal SCI. In addition, following rostral SCI, most injured RS neurons displayed the "injury phenotype," whereas following caudal SCI, most injured neurons displayed normal electrical properties. Second, following rostral SCI, at cold temperatures (~4-5°C), axonal transport was suppressed, axonal regeneration and behavioral recovery were blocked, and injured RS neurons displayed normal electrical properties. Cold temperatures appear to prevent injured RS neurons from detecting and/or responding to SCI. It is hypothesized that following rostral SCI, injured descending brain neurons are strongly stimulated to regenerate their axons, presumably because of elimination of spinal synapses and reduced neurotrophic support. However, when these neurons regenerate their axons and make synapses right below the lesion site, restoration of neurotrophic support very likely suppress further axonal regeneration. In contrast, caudal SCI is a weak stimulus for axonal regeneration, presumably because of spared synapses above the lesion site. These results may have implications for mammalian SCI, which can spare synapses above the lesion site for supraspinal descending neurons and propriospinal neurons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.