Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28468976›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology of the cell2017

Effects of substrate stiffness and actomyosin contractility on coupling between force transmission and vinculin-paxillin recruitment at single focal adhesions.

Dennis W Zhou, Ted T Lee, Shinuo Weng, Jianping Fu, Andrés J García

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology of the cell, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Reduced cell-substrate adhesion formation promotes cell migration inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dennis W ZhouWallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Interdisciplinary Bioengineering Graduate Program, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Ted T LeeWoodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332.
Shinuo WengDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Jianping FuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Andrés J GarcíaWoodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Petit Institute for Bioengineering and Bioscience, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332 andres.garcia@me.gatech.edu.

Funding

Focal Adhesions in Cell Adhesion StrengtheningR01GM065918 · NIGMS · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GARCIA, ANDRES J · 2002 to 2011
$2.6M
PEG hydrogels for progenitor cell deliveryR01HL127236 · NHLBI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIS, MICHAEL E · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL127236NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM065918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Focal adhesions (FAs) regulate force transfer between the cytoskeleton and ECM-integrin complexes. We previously showed that vinculin regulates force transmission at FAs. Vinculin residence time in FAs correlated with applied force, supporting a mechanosensitive model in which forces stabilize vinculin's active conformation to promote force transfer. In the present study, we examined the relationship between traction force and vinculin-paxillin localization to single FAs in the context of substrate stiffness and actomyosin contractility. We found that vinculin and paxillin FA area did not correlate with traction force magnitudes at single FAs, and this was consistent across different ECM stiffness and cytoskeletal tension states. However, vinculin residence time at FAs varied linearly with applied force for stiff substrates, and this was disrupted on soft substrates and after contractility inhibition. In contrast, paxillin residence time at FAs was independent of local applied force and substrate stiffness. Paxillin recruitment and residence time at FAs, however, were dependent on cytoskeletal contractility on lower substrate stiffness values. Finally, substrate stiffness and cytoskeletal contractility regulated whether vinculin and paxillin turnover dynamics are correlated to each other at single FAs. This analysis sheds new insights on the coupling among force, substrate stiffness, and FA dynamics.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonActinsActomyosinAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCell AdhesionCell Culture TechniquesCytoskeletonExtracellular MatrixFibroblastsFocal AdhesionsIntegrinsMiceMuscle ContractionPaxillinProtein BindingActinsActomyosinIntegrinsPaxillinVinculin

Identifiers

PMID28468976
PMCPMC5541841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.