Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28468859›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2017

Isolation of Campylobacter Species from Stool Samples by Use of a Filtration Method: Assessment from a United States-Based Population.

Irving Nachamkin, Phi Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Enhancing surveillance of foodborne bacteria and antimicrobial resistance using a large centralized laboratory database: Case study of Campylobacter and nontyphoidal Salmonella in Peru.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. Genetic Diversity ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Investigating the Significance of Non-Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Species Delineation and Comparative Genomics within theJournal of clinical microbiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Identification and Characterization ofFrontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Epidemiological and Genomic Characterization ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  8. Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  9. Multi-step optimization of the filtration method for the isolation of Campylobacter species from stool samples.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Irving NachamkinDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA irving.nachamkin@uphs.upenn.edu.
Phi NguyenClinical Microbiology Laboratory, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal samples submitted to our clinical microbiology laboratory from patients in the Philadelphia region were prospectively analyzed for

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBacteriological TechniquesCampylobacterCampylobacter InfectionsFecesFemaleFiltrationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhiladelphiaProspective StudiescampylobactercampylobacteriosisCampylobacter jejuniculture methodsgastrointestinal infection

Identifiers

PMID28468859
PMCPMC5483923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.