Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28468775›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer therapeutics2017

Targeting Insulin Receptor in Breast Cancer Using Small Engineered Protein Scaffolds.

Jie Ying Chan, Benjamin J Hackel, Douglas Yee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. ACBD3 Bioinformatic Analysis and Protein Expression in Breast Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. High-throughput developability assays enable library-scale identification of producible protein scaffold variants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  9. Disrupting Insulin and IGF Receptor Function in Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. uc.38 induces breast cancer cell apoptosis via PBX1.American journal of cancer research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie Ying ChanDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Benjamin J HackelDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Douglas YeeDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. yeexx006@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETER C LUCAS · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insulin receptor (InsR) and the type I insulin-like growth factor (IGF1R) are homologous receptors necessary for signal transduction by their cognate ligands insulin, IGF-I and IGF-II. IGF1R mAbs, intended to inhibit malignant phenotypic signaling, failed to show benefit in patients with endocrine-resistant tumors in phase III clinical trials. Our previous work showed that in tamoxifen-resistant cells, IGF1R expression was lacking, but InsR inhibition effectively blocked growth. In endocrine-sensitive breast cancer cells, insulin was not growth stimulatory, likely due to the presence of hybrid InsR/IGF1R, which has high affinity for IGF-I, but not insulin. Combination inhibition of InsR and IGF1R showed complete suppression of the system in endocrine-sensitive breast cancer cells. To develop InsR-binding agents, we employed a small protein scaffold, T7 phage gene 2 protein (Gp2) with the long-term goal of creating effective InsR inhibitors and diagnostics. Using yeast display and directed evolution, we identified three Gp2 variants (Gp2 #1, #5, and #10) with low nanomolar affinity and specific binding to cell surface InsR. These Gp2 variants inhibited insulin-mediated monolayer proliferation in both endocrine-sensitive and resistant breast cancer, but did not downregulate InsR expression. Gp2 #5 and Gp2 #10 disrupted InsR function by inhibiting ligand-induced receptor activation. In contrast, Gp2 #1 did not block InsR phosphorylation. Notably, Gp2 #1 binding was enhanced by pretreatment of cells with insulin, suggesting a unique receptor-ligand-binding mode. These Gp2 variants are the first nonimmunoglobulin protein scaffolds to target insulin receptor and present compelling opportunity for modulation of InsR signaling.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationHumansInsulin-Like Growth Factor IInsulin-Like Growth Factor IIMiceNuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsProtein BindingReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptor, InsulinReceptors, SomatomedinRepressor ProteinsSignal TransductionXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntigens, CDgene 2 product, bacteriophage T7IGF1R protein, humanINSR protein, humanInsulin-Like Growth Factor IInsulin-Like Growth Factor IINuclear Matrix-Associated ProteinsReceptor, IGF Type 1Receptor, InsulinReceptors, SomatomedinRepressor Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28468775
PMCPMC5518922
OpenAlexW2610964034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.