Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28468750›Full record

SynthesisBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2017

Postapproval studies of drugs initially approved by the FDA on the basis of limited evidence: systematic review.

Alison M Pease, Harlan M Krumholz, Nicholas S Downing, Jenerius A Aminawung, Nilay D Shah, Joseph S Ross

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Navigating the Prescription Drug Information System.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. An urgent call to raise the bar in oncology.British journal of cancer · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison M PeaseState University of New York Downstate College of Medicine, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Harlan M KrumholzSection of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nicholas S DowningDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jenerius A AminawungSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Nilay D ShahDivision of Health Care Policy and Research and Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Joseph S RossRobert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Controlled Clinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID28468750
PMCPMC5421452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.