Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28467801›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Inhibition of exportin-1 function results in rapid cell cycle-associated DNA damage in cancer cells.

Russell T Burke, Joshua M Marcus, James D Orth

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reprogramming resistance in advanced lung cancer: epigenetic modulation to restore therapeutic vulnerability.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Russell T BurkeDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
Joshua M MarcusDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
James D OrthDepartment of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

The Yeast Centrosome - Structure Assembly & FunctionP01GM105537 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI DAVIS, TRISHA N. · 2014 to 2018
$8.3M
TRAINING IN SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION &CELL CYCLE REGULATIONT32GM008759 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI AHN, NATALIE G. · 2000 to 2020
$5.9M
Chromatin Degradation During ApoptosisR01GM079097 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI XUE, DING · 2007 to 2015
$2.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM105537NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079097NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective inhibitors of nuclear export (SINE) are small molecules in development as anti-cancer agents. The first-in-class SINE, selinexor, is in clinical trials for blood and solid cancers. Selinexor forms a covalent bond with exportin-1 at cysteine-528, and blocks its ability to export cargos. Previous work has shown strong cell cycle effects and drug-induced cell death across many different cancer-derived cell lines. Here, we report strong cell cycle-associated DNA double-stranded break formation upon the treatment of cancer cells with SINE. In multiple cell models, selinexor treatment results in the formation of clustered DNA damage foci in 30-40% of cells within 8 hours that is dependent upon cysteine-528. DNA damage strongly correlates with G1/S-phase and decreased DNA replication. Live cell microscopy reveals an association between DNA damage and cell fate. Cells that form damage in G1-phase more often die or arrest, while those damaged in S/G2-phase frequently progress to cell division. Up to half of all treated cells form damage foci, and most cells that die after being damaged, were damaged in G1-phase. By comparison, non-transformed cell lines show strong cell cycle effects but little DNA damage and less death than cancer cells. Significant drug combination effects occur when selinexor is paired with different classes of agents that either cause DNA damage or that diminish DNA damage repair. These data present a novel effect of exportin-1 inhibition and provide a strong rationale for multiple combination treatments of selinexor with agents that are currently in use for the treatment of different solid cancers.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell CycleCell DeathCell Line, TumorDNA DamageDNA ReplicationDose-Response Relationship, DrugExportin 1 ProteinHumansHydrazinesKaryopherinsProtein BindingReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearTriazolesAntineoplastic AgentsExportin 1 ProteinHydrazinesKaryopherinsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearselinexorTriazolescell cycleDNA damageselinexortherapeutic combinationsXPO1

Identifiers

PMID28467801
PMCPMC5503625
OpenAlexW2606676276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.