Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28467792›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Assessment of citalopram and escitalopram on neuroblastoma cell lines. Cell toxicity and gene modulation.

Laurent Sakka, Nathalie Delétage, Maryse Chalus, Youssef Aissouni, Valérie Sylvain-Vidal, Stéphane Gobron, Guillaume Coll

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Emerging role of MYB transcription factors in cancer drug resistance.Cancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laurent SakkaLaboratoire d'Anatomie et d'Organogenèse, Laboratoire de Biophysique Sensorielle, NeuroDol, Faculté de Médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Nathalie DelétageNeuronax SAS, Biopôle Clermont-Limagne, F-63360 Saint-Beauzire, France.
Maryse ChalusLaboratoire d'Anatomie et d'Organogenèse, Laboratoire de Biophysique Sensorielle, NeuroDol, Faculté de Médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Youssef AissouniLaboratoire de Pharmacologie Fondamentale et Clinique de la Douleur, NeuroDol, Faculté de Médecine, Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Valérie Sylvain-VidalHelixio, Biopôle Clermont-Limagne, F-63360 Saint-Beauzire, France.
Stéphane GobronNeuronax SAS, Biopôle Clermont-Limagne, F-63360 Saint-Beauzire, France.
Guillaume CollService de Neurochirurgie, Pole RMND, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand Cedex, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRInstitut des Sciences du Mouvement Etienne-Jules Marey · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) are common antidepressants which cytotoxicity has been assessed in cancers notably colorectal carcinomas and glioma cell lines. We assessed and compared the cytotoxicity of 2 SSRI, citalopram and escitalopram, on neuroblastoma cell lines. The study was performed on 2 non-MYCN amplified cell lines (rat B104 and human SH-SY5Y) and 2 human MYCN amplified cell lines (IMR32 and Kelly). Citalopram and escitalopram showed concentration-dependent cytotoxicity on all cell lines. Citalopram was more cytotoxic than escitalopram. IMR32 was the most sensitive cell line. The absence of toxicity on human primary Schwann cells demonstrated the safety of both molecules for myelin. The mechanisms of cytotoxicity were explored using gene-expression profiles and quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). Citalopram modulated 1 502 genes and escitalopram 1 164 genes with a fold change ≥ 2. 1 021 genes were modulated by both citalopram and escitalopram; 481 genes were regulated only by citalopram while 143 genes were regulated only by escitalopram. Citalopram modulated 69 pathways (KEGG) and escitalopram 42. Ten pathways were differently modulated by citalopram and escitalopram. Citalopram drastically decreased the expression of MYBL2, BIRC5 and BARD1 poor prognosis factors of neuroblastoma with fold-changes of -107 (p<2.26 10-7), -24.1 (p<5.6 10-9) and -17.7 (p<1.2 10-7). CCNE1, AURKA, IGF2, MYCN and ERBB2 were more moderately down-regulated by both molecules. Glioma markers E2F1, DAPK1 and CCND1 were down-regulated. Citalopram displayed more powerful action with broader and distinct spectrum of action than escitalopram.

Indexed as

CitalopramGene Regulatory NetworksHumansNeural Stem CellsNeuroblastomaSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsCitalopramSelective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitorscitalopramescitalopramgene modulationMYCNneuroblastoma

Identifiers

PMID28467792
PMCPMC5522106
OpenAlexW2606694517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.