Trial reportJAMA surgery2017
Quality of Patient Decisions About Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.
Trial report in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Cultural and Social Determinants of Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Patient decision aids in breast surgery and breast reconstruction reduce decisional conflict: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2025Pooled it
- Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Assessing the Content and Effect of Web-Based Decision Aids for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- Long-Term Effectiveness of a Decision Support App (Pink Journey) for Women Considering Breast Reconstruction Surgery: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2021Trial
- Long-term Patient-Reported Outcomes in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.JAMA surgery · 2018Trial
- The Architecture of Shared Decision-Making in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Concepts, Measures, and Clinical Realities.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Review
- Racial Differences in Breast Cancer Treatment and Information Access.Journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Mammary organoid-based depot for post-surgical chemotherapy and gland regeneration.Nature biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Correlates of Tumor Biology and Immediate Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy: Real-World Evidence from a Romanian Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Development of a patient decision aid (PDA)for patients undergoing breast reconstructive surgery: towards shared decision-making.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Implementation Science in Breast Reconstruction: A Guide to Closing the Research-to-practice Gap.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Patients' and plastic surgeons' experiences with an online patient decision aid for breast reconstruction: considerations for nationwide implementation.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Measuring patient reported outcomes in brachytherapy: Why we should do it and more importantly how.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2024Review
- Information needs in breast reconstruction after mastectomy: a qualitative analysis of free-text responses from 2077 women.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Enhanced Surgical Decision-Making Tools in Breast Cancer: Predicting 2-Year Postoperative Physical, Sexual, and Psychosocial Well-Being following Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction (INSPiRED 004).Annals of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Individualized 3D-printed bolus promotes precise postmastectomy radiotherapy in patients receiving breast reconstruction.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- 10-Year oncological outcome report after second conservative treatment for ipsilateral breast tumor event.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Development of a patient decision aid for patients with breast cancer who consider immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Patient Perspectives on the Financial Costs and Burdens of Breast Cancer Surgery.JCO oncology practice · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceBreast reconstruction has the potential to improve a person's body image and quality of life but has important risks. Variations in who undergoes breast reconstruction have led to questions about the quality of patient decisions.
objectiveTo assess the quality of patient decisions about breast reconstruction. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsA prospective, cross-sectional survey study was conducted from June 27, 2012, to February 28, 2014, at a single, academic, multidisciplinary oncology clinic among women planning to undergo mastectomy for stage I to III invasive ductal or lobular breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ, or prophylaxis. EXPOSURES: Mastectomy only and mastectomy with reconstruction. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Knowledge, as ascertained using the Decision Quality Instrument; preference concordance, based on rating and ranking of key attributes; and decision quality, defined as having knowledge of 50% or more and preference concordance.
resultsDuring the 20-month period, 214 patients were eligible, 182 were approached, and 32 missed. We enrolled 145 patients (79.7% enrollment rate), and received surveys from 131 patients (72.0% participation rate). Five participants became ineligible. The final study population was 126 patients. Among the 126 women in the study (mean [SD] age, 53.2 [12.1] years), the mean (SD) knowledge score was 58.5% (16.2%) and did not differ by treatment group (mastectomy only, 55.2% [15.0%]; mastectomy with reconstruction, 60.5% [16.5%]). A total of 82 of 123 participants (66.7%) had a calculated treatment preference of mastectomy only; 39 of these women (47.6%) underwent mastectomy only. A total of 41 participants (32.5%) had a calculated treatment preference of mastectomy with reconstruction; 36 of these women (87.8%) underwent mastectomy with reconstruction. Overall, 52 of 120 participants (43.3%) made a high-quality decision. In multivariable analysis, white race/ethnicity (odds ratio [OR], 2.72; 95% CI, 1.00-7.38; P = .05), having private insurance (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.35-1.93; P < .001), having a high school education or less (vs some college) (OR, 4.84; 95% CI, 1.22-19.21; P = .02), having a college degree (vs some college) (OR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.53-2.49; P < .001), and not having a malignant neoplasm (eg, BRCA carriers) (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.25-7.85; P = .01) were independently associated with making a high-quality decision. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: A minority of patients undergoing mastectomy in a single academic center made a high-quality decision about reconstruction. Shared decision making is needed to support decisions about breast reconstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.