ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2017
Synergetic Effects of Combined Nanomaterials for Biosensing Applications.
Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Application of Nanozymes and its Progress in the Treatment of Ischemic Stroke.Translational stroke research · 2024Review
- Simultaneous Catechol and Hydroquinone Detection with Laser Fabricated MOF-Derived Cu-CuO@C Composite Electrochemical Sensor.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Stimulus-Responsive Ultrathin Films for Bioapplications: A Concise Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Hybrid Nanobioengineered Nanomaterial-Based Electrochemical Biosensors.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Self-assembling thermostable chimeras as new platform for arsenic biosensing.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Article
- A review on nanomaterial-based field effect transistor technology for biomarker detection.Mikrochimica acta · 2019Review
- Suppressing Non-Specific Binding of Proteins onto Electrode Surfaces in the Development of Electrochemical Immunosensors.Biosensors · 2019Review
- Smartphone-based clinical diagnostics: towards democratization of evidence-based health care.Journal of internal medicine · 2019Review
- Potential applications of engineered nanoparticles in medicine and biology: an update.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2018Review
- Indirect Microcontact Printing to Create Functional Patterns of Physisorbed Antibodies.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomaterials have become essential components for the development of biosensors since such nanosized compounds were shown to clearly increase the analytical performance. The improvements are mainly related to an increased surface area, thus providing an enhanced accessibility for the analyte, the compound to be detected, to the receptor unit, the sensing element. Nanomaterials can also add value to biosensor devices due to their intrinsic physical or chemical properties and can even act as transducers for the signal capture. Among the vast amount of examples where nanomaterials demonstrate their superiority to bulk materials, the combination of different nano-objects with different characteristics can create phenomena which contribute to new or improved signal capture setups. These phenomena and their utility in biosensor devices are summarized in a non-exhaustive way where the principles behind these synergetic effects are emphasized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.